Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohamed Ouda/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Mohamed Ouda

Mohamed Ouda (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

30 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Repeat creation of Kelly Hyman by all suspected users. Kelly Hyman (attorney) was deleted two weeks ago and Mohamed Ouda recreated it under Kelly Hyman (lawyer) which is an exact copy of Kelly Hyman (attorney) and he used this image which was uploaded by Brio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who was blocked by BU Rob13. The following users are already blocked.

Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Observation: The alleged sockmaster is an admin on the Arabic Wikipedia who has global renaming rights (see m:Global renamers). Perhaps Mohamed Ouda would care to explain his activities? ~Anachronist (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@BU Rob13: Can you shed some light on this? You can e-mail me if you prefer.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't really have anything to add beyond the technical evidence connecting the four accounts I blocked. This is extremely likely to be paid editing, and it's very possible that they've employed multiple different paid editors, but the four accounts I blocked were related. ~ Rob13Talk 16:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given Rob's comments and the length of time this has been sitting here, no action is going to be taken. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:49, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Josephintechnicolor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

The previous SPI filing was described as recreating the article of Kelly Hyman. The new alleged suspect, recreating Kelly Hyman yet again in Draft:Kelly Hyman. He also once tagging himself with COI with Giuseppe G. Ruisi. Not sure it was yet another reincarnation of paid editor or not. Requesting CU because in previous filing, BU Rob13 stated that the 4 blocked accounts are related [by technical evidence?] Matthew hk (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To admin. Please compare the versions of the articles at titles, Kelly Hyman, Kelly Hyman (attorney) and Draft:Kelly Hyman (edit: at Kelly Hyman (lawyer) as well 19:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)), as i don't have admin rights to view the deleted content. The article namespace of the subject was SALTed for new user.
And here is the related xFD.
BTW sock, meatsock and paid editor for the same person are the same thing to me. Matthew hk (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Dear Mohamed Ouda, Mohamed Ouda

I searched for a "Kelly Hyman" article before creating it and there was none that I could find. I created it on the merits of the Young Teen Award Nomination and her role in the Young and the restless and others. I have seen her acting and between the Nomination for the Young Teen Award and other roles I felt that she was notable. Around late December 2018 I noticed there was a "Kelly Alexandra Hyman" article by Beqabai. Beqabai removed the deletion template making the article live, the article was soon denied and deleted again. I discussed this with some editors to clarify I had no involvement and no affiliation with Beqabai. A few editors told me that Kelly Hyman needs a second notable acting role before she can be approved. So at this point I will allow the Kelly Hyman wiki to delete unless there is a good news source that she landed another notable role or other. The Giuseppe G. Ruisi is a neutrally worded article with no payment involved and was substantiated by Italian Wikipedia who thanked me for the work with a barnstar. The COI tag was due to a distant relation. Nevertheless the wikipedia article is about a Supreme Court Judge of Rome, Italy who, I feel, as a result of his position is notable regardless. For this work I received a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:1l2l3k barnstar.

Matthew hk is relentless in his attack upon me due to other reasons which he is not admitting. Please visit Wikipedia:Teahouse#Matthew_HK_and_Raiffeisen_ZentralBank_and_Raiffeisen_International https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Matthew_HK_and_Raiffeisen_ZentralBank_and_Raiffeisen_International to know more. Matthew HK is not the right sort of individual for Wikipedia. His attack upon me and defense of "Raiffeisen" wikipedia articles can only suggest that he is CLOSELY related to the topic of Raiffeisen and is perhaps(?) a paid editor. He is rewriting / deleting history across several Raiffeisen wikipedias and violating standard protocols by trying to use basic wiki rules to create a noisy distraction and rewriting / deleting what he wants to tell the world. Matthew HK's behavior is irregular, inappropriate and a distraction. The tier 1 news I sourced relating to Raiffeisen is relevant and there are abundant sources. Matthew HK is clearly trying to disassociate Raiffeisen's past with Raiffeisen Bank Intl. and will do whatever he must to achieve his goal even if it requires debunking (deleting) thousands of sources that say all the Raiffeisen entities are inter-related with his 2 sources that are ambiguous and contorted. Look here and you will see how Matthew HK defends Raiffeisen's Holocaust and Mafia news as Controversy and when that did not work he now tries to rename the Raiffeisen entity / wiki page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raiffeisen_Zentralbank

I have created a few good wikis and done some edits but I am not without mistakes and far from perfect. I expect to achieve a higher level of wikipedia skill over time. I feel that the Ruisi and Rivercrest wikipedias are fairly good starts and I plan to be a long term valued contributor to Wikipedia going forward.

03:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Yet another recreation of Kelly Alexandra Hyman. No edits outside recreating this salted article under a new title. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:42, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It may be meat sock instead. Same subjects (Kelly Hyman and user:Shinsway1977) were the centre of another SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheAudioArtistSubmiter/Archive#04 June 2019. However, as i can't access the page history of deleted material , may i suggest to compare to versions created by Josephintechnicolor, Shinsway1977 and other alleged sock and meatsock? Matthew hk (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Given the variety of sockpuppeteers interested in Kelly Hyman, we can't conclusively link this editor to any one of them. That being said, they're clearly engaged in promotional editing, so I've blocked them on that basis. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Another one with another page on Draft:Kelly Alexandra Hyman. GSS (talk|c|em) 00:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This time this user have the almost exact wording in the draft that was tagged for speedy deletion under the same draft title Draft:Kelly Alexandra Hyman. Ducking or the meat sock got the same word file / code to post to wikipedia. The user account was created in 2018, but looks like a sleeper. Matthew hk (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clear COI issue that the user Shirodahacker denied. See his talk page message Special:Diff/902552107. You can't be a random uni student that have the almost exact draft on wiki codes level. And the user without any edits outside other topic (except Aliyu Ibrahim Gebi which looks like another article that paid to insert in wiki) Matthew hk (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anyone that interested in Josephintechnicolor's explanation could be seen in this edit: Special:Diff/903168901. Since he placed the comment in /Archive page. It had been removed from the archive. Since he is quite fishy on keep asking to insert Hyman in article namespace in teahouse. I hardly AGF is just another "coincidence".
Thus, if someone have admin rights, in the merit of promotional meat sock, please compare the code and sentence structure of Draft:Kelly Alexandra Hyman, created by Shinsway1977 (blocked) and Shirodahacker, as well as Draft:Kelly Hyman, last created by Josephintechnicolor. The article was also created under Kelly Alexandra Hyman, Kelly Hyman, Kelly Hyman (lawyer), Kelly Hyman (attorney), Draft:Kelly Hyman (attorney) and may be more article/draft titles. Matthew hk (talk) 22:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mohamed_Ouda/Archive&oldid=1036311973"