Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IHR.HIASO/Archive

IHR.HIASO (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• BeloyiseBurron (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• PapasGrandes (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

These users are all SPAs at Brand.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). BeloyiseBurron was edit warring a couple of months ago, was blocked and hasn't edited since. Yesterday IHR.HIASO turned up at the article and made five similar edits to BeloyiseBurron: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. PapasGrandes turned up today to defend IHR.HIASO's edits on the talk page. SmartSE (talk) 21:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• IHR.HIASO (talk · contribs) and PapasGrandes (talk · contribs) are  Confirmed to each other. The results are  Inconclusive with regard to their connection to BeloyiseBurron.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I indeffed and tagged the confirmed puppet. I blocked the master for one month. No action against BeloyiseBurron, although that doesn't mean the account can't be blocked for other reasons if warranted.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• BetsMetsnJets (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• HOT.hot.HEATers (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

[6][7] Continuation of sockpuppet case related to Brand.com. John Nagle (talk) 17:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• BetsMetsnJets is definitely  Possible technically. HOT.hot.HEATers is  Unlikely, but WP:MEAT cannot be discounted. Regardless, I've semi-protected the article to discourage further socking.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 21:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Too few edits to be sure they're related and I can't justify a block for promotional editing. Hopefully the semi will take care of it. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]