Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Equivocasmannus/Archive

Equivocasmannus (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• 92.236.212.150 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

WP:QUACK, most especially at White culture, even making the same mistake of redirecting to the wrong page again with the initial change. IP address being used for WP:BLOCKEVASION as sockmaster is indef'd for violations of BLP policy. Keri (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Identical behaviour:[reply]

1. master [1] puppet [2]
2. master (immediately spots mistake) [3] puppet (same) [4] Keri (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk note: @Keri:. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk note:  Looks like a duck to me (and a funny one, really). An admin should block the IP for three days. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• InterPersonalAutomaton (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

1. Equivocasmannus was indeffed on 26 May 2015 for persistent violations of BLP. The account InterPersonalAutomaton was created on 31 May 2015.
2. Both accounts argue the definition of Atheism on Talk:Atheism: "Atheism= believing god does not exist. That is all." [5] "atheism is the rejection of theism, or belief in at least one God" [6].
3. Both accounts are determined to redirect White culture to Culture of Europe: [7] [8] [9]
4. Both accounts home in on Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, Atheism, British National Party, List of fallacies and List of prisoners with whole-life tariffs. Block evasion has also been previously carried out using 92.236.212.150.
5. Both accounts appear to be white supremacists of some kind, with InterPersonalAutomaton even attempting to create his user page with the (non-existent) template {National Socialist}.
6. Reading the history of Talk:InterPersonalAutomaton [10] demonstrates the repeated same disruptive editing in the same venues and multiple warnings that led to the orifginal indef of Equivocasmannus.
7. Very obvious WP:DUCK, very obvious WP:BLOCKEVASION. Keri (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it shocking to think two separate people would object to a racist page being linked to every time someone inputs "white culture" in this encyclopedia?

I can't think of an explanation, except sock-farming. You cretinous fools.InterPersonalAutomaton (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• See also [11] Keri (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is no more uncivil than starting an SPI. Keri (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk endorsed - evidence number 3 is especially convincing. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Keri, don't tag users as socks. Leave it to admins and clerks. It is very WP:UNCIVIL to do so. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Blocked indef as an obvious sock of Equivocasmannus (but really WP:NOTHERE even in the unlikely event that they're not), whether it's worth CU for sleepers is a decision I'll let someone else make. Black Kite (talk) 16:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• No history of creating large number of socks. No need for sleepers check. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Callmeish (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

1. WP:DUCK.
2. Most-recently detected sock InterPersonalAutomaton (talk · contribs · block log) was indeffed 22 July; this account was created 23 July.
3. Editor cannot resist returning to their previous venues: Jack the Ripper [12] [13] Malmedy massacre [14] [15] Jack Straw [16] [17]
4. And the smoking gun on White American:

Makes edit: [18] (summary "remove pseudo-historical tosh")

Realizes edit was wrong place and fixes: [19] (summary "wrong section removed")

Latest sock makes edit: [20] (summary "obscure europhobic section that adds nothing. one wonders what would happen if "african slavery" were linked to on the page about african-americans")

Realizes made same mistake again, fixes: [21] (summary "wrong section")

This is identical behaviour to their editing at White culture:

master [22] puppet [23]

master (immediately spots mistake) [24] puppet (same) [25]
Keri (talk) 12:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Admin action needed -  Looks like a duck to me. Please, indef the sock. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Done, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Friedansdasbosch (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK at White culture.

1. Master: [26]
2. Sock1: [27]
3. Sock2: [28]
4. Friedansdasbosch: [29]

Keri (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• No reason givden for requesting a CU. The master is  Stale, and there are no confirmed puppets to compare against, although if there were a reason to check for sleepers, a check against suspected puppets might be reasonable.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  I think this is WP:DUCK. Although he made just two edits, those are typical for the master. Please, indef the sock. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Blocked and tagged per request. Mkdw^talk 01:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---