Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doorzki/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Doorzki

Doorzki (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

05 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


First edit made by MortyCommie (obviously an attack account)[1] is the same edit User:Doorzki has made 6 times today [2]. LionMans Account (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Another user suggested might be affiliated with [3]. I must agree.LionMans Account (talk) 21:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello. This report is against my account. I have only one account. You are free to investigate to the fullest as I have nothing to hide. This person, Morty C-137, seems incensed beyond reason that I would remove the libelous term "hardliner" from a politicians page, and has been edit warring with me as a result. He is furious that there are other people who seem to support my view. This report is part of his harassment against me (please also see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard and his extreme personal attacks on me) that includes reverting my changes elsewhere. Ironically, I suspect him of being a puppet but since I feel this has gone to such an extreme, I am not filing a report. However, I welcome you to investigate my account to the fullest as I have done nothing wrong. Thank you. Doorzki (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The extreme personal attacks on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard have now extended to other commenters. Honestly, I can take the abuse by Morty C-137 but I feel bad for anyone who dares offer any opinion Morty doesn't like. It will not end peacefully so long as Morty is on Wikipedia. Doorzki (talk) 05:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I want to mention I was not informed of this action and only learned about it when Morty C-137 viciously attacked another user, MelanieN, on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard for suggesting he file this report if he suspects sockpuppetry. I was under the impression it is polite to inform a user of complaints against their account. If nothing else, filing this report in secret was rude. Doorzki (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Points of order:

  1. - I do not engage in "extreme personal attacks". Doorzki appears to be engaged in Psychological projection.
  2. - As far as the term, it is the exact term used in the article cited; Doorzki has, however, engaged both in talk-page personal attacks against individuals AND edit-summary personal attacks, long before I noticed the pages in question on the Recent Changes list.
  3. - I didn't file this SPI. That would be Lionmans Account.

In short... virtually nothing Doorzki is saying here is based in fact. Morty C-137 (talk) 05:23, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of D.H.110 behavior

  1. Deleting evidence under a false edit summary repeatedly and repeatedly is definitely a D.H.110 thing to do.
  2. [4] talk page comments like this are typical of D.H.110.
  3. [5] massive amount of insults including "aww poor baby", "It must be so hard to be so sensitive", "Sorry if I didn't provide a "trigger warning."", "Hope you can find the strength to continue..."
  4. " I follow Snooganssnoogans and Activist because..." - Admitting to wikihounding.
  5. [6] - String of ridiculous accusations and personal attacks.

I could go on but I think this evidence shows a likelihood that this is a D.H.110 sockpuppet. Morty C-137 (talk) 04:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is pretty much a textbook D.H.110 comment. Morty C-137 (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sro23:: If you review this conversation that happened when Doorzki began to engage in talk-page harassment of SnoogansSnoogans, I think you'll see the similarity to talk-page harassment committed by a number of D.H.110 sockpuppets. Morty C-137 (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Doorzki has been blocked by Future Perfect at Sunrise. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 05:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.