Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DevilBlack69

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

DevilBlack69

DevilBlack69 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

17 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

LibbieBeautyQueen Recreates Draft:Miss Globe 2022. Similar username as many of DevilBlack69's earlier socks. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also the following, with indicated registration date/time.

via quarry:query/67101. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:KeylaBeauty and User:KaileyKnight are also recent Miss Globe editors. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I was already investigating LibbieBeautyQueen before I saw this SPI, and it's about as blatant a sockpuppet as I've seen for years, so I've blocked the account and deleted all its editing. Of the others, the only ones which have edited are KeylaBeauty, KaileyKnight, & LaylaBeautyQueen. I don't see enough in the rather small amount of editing from those accounts to prove sockpuppetry, though of course it's possible. However, in view of the history of this sockpuppeteer, which makes further sleepers likely, the fact that we have one definite new sockpuppet, and the fact that there are several more possible sockpuppets, I think a CheckUser investigation may be a good idea. JBW (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following are  Confirmed and blocked:
  • Is it even worth tagging these accounts anymore? They're so duckish they're caught before they even have a chance to edit in most cases.-- Ponyobons mots 19:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As obvious as these socks are, there will always be value in clearly linking a blocked sock to a particular case. You never know how someone previously unfamiliar with a given sockfarm will find it. Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Usual behaviour and name. Wikishovel (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Some more probables listed above. Quarry 67101. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Usual behaviour and name: Draft:Miss Intercontinental 2023. Wikishovel (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Here are a couple more from quarry query 67101. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bri, requesting checkuser for further sleepers. Wikishovel (talk) 03:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk endorsed - With all of these accounts registered since the last check, it's probably worth looking to if they have any more. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Likely to the previous accounts, and very ducky. Don't see any other accounts. Girth Summit (blether) 09:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DevilBlack69&oldid=1224602201"