Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Couponpitara/Archive

Couponpitara (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Moolchandra (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Erinmenal (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

The master I choose here is already blocked for using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion purpose only and the sock1 replaced a dead link at Socially responsible investing with www.couponpitara.com (see here) and now sock2 created a redirect page CouponPitara so as per the username of the master and the edit behaviour of socks  Looks like a duck to me. GSS (talk) 08:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I am unrelated to the User:Moolchandra and User:Couponpitara. I just created the redirect as I was asked to by the owner of CouponPitara who is known to me. If this is a COI violation then I will never edit anything related to the website or its owner. The evidences are very weak. User:Couponpitara never blocked for socking. User:Moolchandra never created the page or any other pages. I never added any links of the website. I just created the redirect for the website. --Erinmenal (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated in my evidence above the master is already blocked for using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion purpose only because s/he was also doing the same thing as sock1 (User:Moolchandra) and after some time of his/her block User:Moolchandra repeated the same thing (replaced a dead link at Socially responsible investing with www.couponpitara.com (see this) and also added a link at GoDaddy (see this)). User:Couponpitara never blocked for socking because s/he was already blocked when sock1 comes up and no-one opened a Sockpuppet investigation on them and you created a redirect today for the same subject even if not from the same IP but still It looks like a duck to me because all three account doesn't have any other edits then this subject. GSS (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? because all three account doesn't have any other edits then this subject really? I have only one edit for the said website and rest of my contributions are unrelated to the website and to these accounts! Check my contributions first. Erinmenal (talk) 16:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opps! I missed that you won. As you already agreed that you were asked to create Redirect by the owner of CouponPitara who is known to you and am sure they have told you the story that one of their account is blocked and the second one has some warnings also the link is reported as spam (see here). GSS (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in a game with you so please be civil and focused on the context. Secondly FYI, I wasn't informed about this block or any of these accounts otherwise I wouldn't have created a redirect to Economy of Mumbai because it will obviously affect my account. These attempts must have been done by any of their employees and it is very usual for any person to edit pages related to their working place, geographical location or interests. So, do not blindly assume anything!Erinmenal (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk note: The alleged master is  Stale. GAB^gab 16:23, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Moolchandra is a WP:Duck, so I indeffed it. Erinmenal is obviously a wp:Meatpuppet. I don't think block is needed. They should be aware of our WP:MEAT policy. Editing on behalf of someone else is not allowed. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]