Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Causeandedit/Archive
Causeandedit
- Causeandedit (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
11 March 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- TinyDancer1489 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Googlebrand (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bones5711 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
- Smoove Gotti - Causeandedit, sole defender at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoove Gotti, artist is a Hoopla Worldwide associated act (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Jonathan Hay (publicist), Sabrina (pop singer), Audio Stepchild, A Different Kind Of Christmas). Diffs gone but warnings remain. Googlebrand, creator of article User talk:Googlebrand. Bones5711, disruption at afd [[1]].
- A Different Kind Of Christmas - Tag team creation by Googlebrand and Causeandedit [2]. Album is released by Hoopla Worldwide.
- Michael Barber (musician) - Tag team editing by Googlebrand, TinyDancer1489, Bones5711 and Causeandedit [3]. Introducing Hoopla Worldwide related info, Bones5711 [4]: TinyDancer1489 [5]
- Jonathan Hay Publicity - Diffs gone but afd and warnings remain. Bones5711 Article creator [[6]]. Causeandedit sole defender at afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Hay Publicity, promotional editing. Hoopla World wide is another Jonathan Hay publicity company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Hopefully I'm doing this right because I've never done this. I have one user duffbeerforme who has attacked every page I've created and now is accusing me of being a "sockpuppet"? Looking at the definition of "sockpuppet" doesn't apply to me at all and is very offensive. I am one user and one user only with the same IP address in Louisville, Kentucky. I edit things I'm passionate about which is things based in Louisville, Kentucky AND people from Louisville, Kentucky. Causeandedit (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- After reading more about a "sockpuppet" I find it even more offensive. This user duffbeerforme has attacked everything I've done. The question I have here is, when Wikipedia has found out that in no way am I a sockpuppet, what happens to the person who made the false claim (duffbeerforme) and has attacked everything I've done? Surely this behavior isn't accepted by Wikipedia.Causeandedit (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- As far your claim on me being the "sole defender" on Smoove Gotti, once again you are wrong. I said "I was on the fence about it". I didn't say to keep or delete. As far as Jonathan Hay the publicist goes, absolutely he should have a wikipedia page. Just look at the MAJOR HEADLINE news involving him and the Ariel Winter trial a few months ago. PLEASE STOP WITH THE ACCUSATIONS AND HARRASEMENT! Causeandedit (talk) 21:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- After reading more about a "sockpuppet" I find it even more offensive. This user duffbeerforme has attacked everything I've done. The question I have here is, when Wikipedia has found out that in no way am I a sockpuppet, what happens to the person who made the false claim (duffbeerforme) and has attacked everything I've done? Surely this behavior isn't accepted by Wikipedia.Causeandedit (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'd like to see a Checkuser run this. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please whoever you are Checkuser, run this please. I'm SO tired of these accusations. I have spent so many hours editing wikipedia and donated thousands of dollars to the cause... This place needs some real policy.Causeandedit (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: Googlebrand (talk · contribs) and Bones5711 (talk · contribs) are stale. TinyDancer1489 (talk · contribs) is just barely not. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Clerk declined - After reviewing this, I find there is insufficient evidence to perform a checkuser. There may be something to the connection between the three accounts accused of being socks of Causeandedit, but there is nothing to connect Causeandedit to them besides shared interest. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Administrator note Causeandedit has been indeffed for promotional editing and WP:NOTHERE. The other accounts may qualify for meatpuppetry but since they are stale I don't see a need to act there. De728631 (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)- Closing as there is nothing for SPI to do here. Someguy1221 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
13 March 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- TinyDancer1489 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
TinyDancer1489 is no longer stale, editing re Hoopla Worldwide signed artist [7]. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Not only is there barely enough evidence to run the check, Causeandedit and TinyDancer are
Unrelated. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
