Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blendi111/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Blendi111

Blendi111 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

16 January 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Drila484 made their only edit to Sigal Prishtina restoring already removed unsourced content to a BLP added by a dynamic IP. I believe this dynamic IP (and Drila484) may be same person as Driloon77 and Drilonn7. If you look at the dynamic IP and Driloon77 for example, both removed maintenance tags here (IP) and here (Driloon77) with two hours apart. Drilonn7 created Samir Shaptahoviç (in an other name) and directly after he stopped editing that article the dynamic IP followed and it has also been edited by Driloon77 after that and both the IP and Driloon77 removed BLPPPROD without adding source ([1] and [2]). They are all editing the same articles and there is also the name similarities. Qed237 (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also now that I think of it perhaps we should also include Blendi111 (talk · contribs) as creator of Stanimir Marinov which got BLPPROD almost immediately and then Driloon77 removed the BLPPROD as explained earlier and looking at the history it looks like they are editing same article.

Also I know dynamic IP is problematic, but perhaps it could be rangeblocked? Qed237 (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


25 January 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Same sort of behaviour as previous socks. For example adding practically the same unsourced content here at Sigal Prishtina as sock Drila484 did in this edit. Also removed AfD tag in this edit at Stanimir Marinov created by the sockmaster and BLPPROD and maintance tags has been removed before ([3] [4]) at that article and the AFD has been removed by suspected related dynamic IP here. Qed237 (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to add that images uploaded by this editor should also probably be removed. At KB Peja a logo has been removed twice ([5] and [6]) by bot after image created by sock had been removed and it was now readded by Loni3233 (added here and modified here). It has been uploaded by Loni3233 as "own work". The same at Jason Washburn where the dynamic IP also attempted to add image uploaded by one of the socks (diff). Is it possible with a rangeblock for the 46.99 dynamic IP (if they are the same editor, which it looks like)? Qed237 (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


10 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

The editor add obvious copyright image (found at quick google search) at Edmond Azemi (see diff) just like a previous sock (with similar filename) before it was removed (diff). The editor also changes place of birth (diff) like previous sock at Dardan Berisha ([7] and [8]). Qed237 (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also adding Xhoi9797 for the same kind of place of birth changes and it might be good to check for sleepers. Qed237 (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Exactly same behaviour removing AfD tag and updating kosovo basketball players. Qed237 (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



19 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Same articles and same behaviour as previous socks. Qed237 (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


24 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Same edits as previous socks. Qed237 (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of article created by a previous sock. Qed237 (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, and tagged, along with Riad88 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


30 March 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating and editing same articles as previous socks Qed237 (talk) 22:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments