Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benkeyz/Archive

Benkeyz

All of these accounts were clearly created for the express purpose of !voting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Kunda Junior. Since the arguments of the first few match Futboldel1's comments, they seem the most likely sock master. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Otrofil (talk · contribs), Cfc92t (talk · contribs), Dsantosio (talk · contribs), Jamieforster (talk · contribs) SheffieldWed2 (talk · contribs) and Futboldel1 (talk · contribs) are all Confirmed to the actual master Benkeyz (talk · contribs). I've blocked the socks indef, but will leave the decision as to how to handle the master account to the very capable SPI clerks. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved to this title per CU finding. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note I've blocked the master indefinitely due to the number of socks, disruption caused and the small number of contribs of the master which don't demonstrate an engagement with the community. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:08, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Account was registered after the last round of socks were block and recreated the article on Gabriel Kunda Junior, original created by Benkeyz, just hours after it was deleted. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Indeffed and tagged based on duck. Article deleted per G5. Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benkeyz originally began socking to vote-stack Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Kunda Junior and then to recreate the article. Dossantos80 has now also recreated this article at Gabriel Bwalya Kunda Junior. Nikovalent did the same under Gabriel kunda jr footballer. This appears to be the accounts' sole purpose. Both accounts also created a user-space sandbox as their first edit to the 'pedia, but then never used it. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Awaiting administrative action - Assuming that the editors created those pages as listed, looks open-and-shut to me. Please indef the two socks. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked and tagged. Both accounts' deleted contribs show they created the articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]