Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 August 5
I'd love any feedback or corrections on this article
Scja8568 (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, the article is well written from a neutral point of view and backed up with Reliable sources, so that's a very good start. The only criticisms I would make are very minor:
- Try formatting the references using citation templates such as {{Cite news}} or {{Cite web}}, they produce a more professional look, and provide more information than bare urls,
- Using all caps for the name of the musical is not recommended unless it is an acronym, see WP:ALLCAPS.
Quasihuman | Talk 09:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear editors, I'm seeking help for comments to this article. There are quite strict requirements from Wikipedia and need to know if the direction of the article is correct. Appreciate your help. Thanks!
MPIntl (talk) 02:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- You need to find a lot more references. Without references, your article may be deleted once you move into Wikipedia. Good job with the article layout and length though. Also, the first paragraph may need some work to make it neutral. Miguel AG (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Looking for help to make sure the page doesnt get deleted. I can obtain any/all sources and references.
Rtoma321 (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, the article needs more references to prove notability, especially non-trivial third-party coverage in newspapers, magazines etc. If you don't know how to add references to an article, read WP:REFB. If the article ends up being deleted, it's not the end of the world, most admins will move a deleted article into a page in your userspace if you ask, you can then work on it without the threat of deletion (in most cases) until it is ready to be moved back into article space. I've got you started by adding two references I found, more are needed. Quasihuman | Talk 11:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I graduated from UC Berkeley with a degree in Interdisciplinary Field Studies and wrote a 40 page thesis with citations and this website is the most confusing thing I've ever had to deal with.
I simply want to list Dale Borglum and The Living/Dying Project on this site so that others are aware of a non-profit group that helps them or their loved ones with conscious dying.
Do you need more?
Thank you.
Swainchampagne (talk) 03:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, you haven't established Notability which is done by showing that the entity is discussed in multiple reliable sources. You have one link to a table of contents, of the Sun, suggesting that there has been one mention, but that's not enough.
- More importantly, I had to delete the article, because it was an unambiguous copyright violation of [1].--SPhilbrickT 15:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I have added as many as seven links to my article. Yet, it says the article needs review. Pl help.
Michaelsmith999000 (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Are you involved with the company in some way? Wikipedia requires that articles are written from a neutral point of view, if you work for the company, you have a conflict of interest which might make it difficult for you to write with neutrality. Also, Wikipedia is neither the place to advertise your company, or a web hosting service. I have removed the unreviewed tag. See also my comments on the talk page. Quasihuman | Talk 10:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I spent some time adding resources and content to this page, and I would like to be reviewed for layout and neutrality. I would also request that if deemed large enough, the "stub" tag can be removed.
Jtwall12 (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello All,
I created this "article" (list of computer vision geometry and mathematics) that shows an organisation of the geometric and mathematical topics central to computer vision and image processing. This was originally proposed in the CVonline resource. This list is an extension to the List of computer vision topics. My aim is to expand the content of the aforementioned list with linking sub-lists like the one presented in this article.
Effectively the organization and connection between different concepts will be presented to the reader so that he/she will have a better understanding of computer vision related topics. The list provides links to wikipedia articles like in the List of computer vision topics. Unfortunately, wikipedia does not have all the information available regarding computer vision. More lists like the one you are reviewing here are going to follow and everything is going to be connected to the List of computer vision topics.
The organization of these lists is going to follow the CVonline organization.
Please leave your comments and suggestions.
Papadim.G (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
This is a request for someone to review this new page. Thanks.
Informis (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
[2] Rosseau Fall Fair - new article
This is a new article about the Rosseau Fall Fair. I have used reliable sources, produced by the Rosseau Historical Society, Township records and oral interviews. I'd appreciate any comments that could lead to improvements of the article. Thanks very much.
PeggyNagle (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Requesting feedback to remove "new article" template. The article is mainly based on Broderick's public domain NASA bio. Only two other articles (NEEMO and Dafydd Williams) link to this one, but I have not added the "orphan" template because it is presently recommended only for articles with no incoming links.
Gildir (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
This is my first wikipedia article, and I'm just wondering if the layout and content are suitable, and if the photo gallery is properly set up.
Thank you!
MuseHistorical (talk) 18:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
This is my first new article. Any help in improving it is appreciated.
Brainbeat (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Somebody please review my article on Sikivu Hutchinson. Thank you!
Dante8 (talk) 20:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Please review my new article on Debbie Goddard. Thanks.
Dante8 (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Emie Allen
Swimmy12345 (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Okay just basically a quick read-through by someone other than me, the creator of the article, on a New York artist-couple.
Aichikawa (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Please review my article about Greta Christina. Thank you.