Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Steven130793

• Steven130793 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Porterfield73 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Sunderlandsupporter (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (Added 17:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC) --LS)

• Code letter:G

• Supporting evidence: See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Steven130793. Admin Zzuuzz and myself have both received email requests for unblock after I blocked indef in response to an AIV report, and he deleted the page this user had been editing. Only two edits were the blanking of another indef blocked user's page, a page Steven130793 had vandalized, which I can see as justifying the suspicion, but Porterfield defends on the grounds that he was removing potentially offensive text. I decided we needed a Checkuser to see if the two were related before I felt comfortable with an unblock. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also listing Sunderlandsupporter (talk · contribs), as they were mentioned in the SSP case. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed also Grizzly6117, Axemunger and Gamezmaster .YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 08:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Main account has been blocked for one week by Daniel Case (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), all other confirmed accounts have been indef blocked. Tiptoety ^talk 21:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]