Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rajsingam

Rajsingam

• Rajsingam (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rajkumar Kanagasingam (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• DoDoBirds (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

User:Rajsingam has previously acknowledged that User:DoDoBirds was his sock puppet, apologized for violating WP:SOCK and promised he won't use sockpuppets again, so no further action was pursued against him.[1] After been quite for a while, last week User:Rajsingam made the following personal attack against User:Netmonger [2] (with whom he previously had a dispute which led to User:Netmonger to file a Request for Comment against him), and User:DoDoBirds defamed Wikipedia on User talk:Jimbo Wales.[3] Both accounts were subsequently indef blocked.[4]

A new user called User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam then popped up and claimed that he was the owner of the previous two accounts,[5] and that he shared the password for the accounts with User:RaveenS and User:Bakasuprman and one of them misused the account to carry out the personal attacks.[6] After both users protested, and RaveenS said he was going to report him to WP:LIBEL, User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam then claimed that someone had hacked into his account and found out his password. He now has suggested that either I or User:Netmonger did it.

I would appreciate if Checkuser could find whether User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam and whoever made this personal attack are the same person, because if so he would be violating an indefinite community block. If not, can you please try and find out who manipulated the account User:Rajsingam--snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 10:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved a long reply by User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam to the talk page per guidelines that the request should only include a brief summery. --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 17:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: You have made the checkuser request with manipulative statements. I have suspicion you were trying to hack my password because the evidencehere. But Netmonger tried and the evidences are here.The one who misused my "Rajsingam" and "DoDoBirds" are actually Netmonger. And I explained what has happened further here. So I request Checkuser should be used for him also.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 10:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Unnecessary Users who are playing disruptive games with sock puppets can be indefinitely blocked by any admin. It is not necessary to figure out which particular puppets belong to which particular masters. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]