Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Proteus

• Proteus (talk · contribs)
• Le_baron (talk · contribs)

Proteus strongly opposed a guideline not to use honorifics. The Le baron account has been used to repeatedly add honorifics to a vast number of articles despite repeated requests to stop. Arniep 13:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Absolutely not. You've made this accusation elsewhere, and it's completely unfounded. Le baron is not a sockpuppet of Proteus, nor of anyone else I can find. Proteus is a Wikipedian in good standing, and is not using sockpuppets. I feel compelled to insist that you stop this ridiculous witchhunt. Mackensen (talk) 15:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was very inappropriate for you to check when you have shown hostility to my position on the very issue above. Arniep 17:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might. My hostility comes from the request. It so happens that I've been active here the last few days. I'll go ahead and grab some other folks to double-check, but they'll tell you the same thing. Mackensen (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be taking this to the admin noticeboard as users shouldn't be attacked for requesting check user. Arniep 17:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let me clarify that by absolutely not I mean that they are aboslutely not the same person. Mackensen (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed: this is about as clear a negative as you can get. No chance these are the same person. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on the pump I didn't believe check user would show anything, it is quite easy to be seen to be two continents apart yet be editing in two different browsers on the same PC. Arniep 17:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you can't prove that I'm not the Queen of England, either. Unless you've got some evidence to support this rather remarkable accusation, take it somewhere else. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]