Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nintendude

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nintendude}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Nintendude (second request)

  • Code letter: F

The edit history of Curly snake is absolutely 100% textbook Nintendude (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) (aka Kittyslasher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) et. al.) & his Socks. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nintendude. Per Mackensen's earlier findings it is probably beneficial to check any users created by the underlying IP and block them, as well as the IP if it resolves to Roadrunner...Isotope23 14:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. One additional sock:

  1. Rolling Ralph (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

-- Mackensen (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendude

  • Code letter: F

User:Nintendude is indef blocked, but has been block evading with a whole bunch of socks. Circumstantial evidence suggests he edits from 24.208.226.51 and I'm guessing a checkuser on some of his most recent socks (User:Jay the evil Mexican, User:White Taurus, User:Brolsma for example) will yield that IP. Is there any way we could get a checkuser and if get this IP blocked if it is tied to these sockpuppets? It's a Roadrunner IP so it will likely change in a few months, but at least it would WP:DENY (particularly if the IP could be account creation blocked) him for now.--Isotope23 19:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fistful of sockpuppets. I nailed a couple dozen sleeper accounts that hadn't gotten blocked. Without being too direct on the matter, that IP's getting a lump of coal for Christmas. Mackensen (talk) 00:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I knew there were more, both used and unused. He's been on a rampage of user creation since his indef. Hopefully this stops it for a while.--Isotope23 00:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: A complete list of socks blocked by Mackensen is on the talk page of this request. Also, Mackensen, were the socks listed as part of the initial request (Jay the evil Mexican, White Taurus, Brolsma) confirmed? Daniel.Bryant T · C ] 03:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The primary ones listed here, yes. A few on the related page as well. Most were simply too old to check. Mackensen (talk) 15:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kittyslasher

Kittyslasher is currently blocked for vandalism/borderline trolling. Not only have they been talking to each other a lot, since 7 minutes after Kittyslasher's first edit, but Nintendude is the creator of Template:lowercase-Apple, a template that was deleted back in December. Seems inconspicuous, but Kittyslasher made the same template at Template:Iprefix, in May. Kittyslasher also already AfDed two things and commented in 4 others after just 10 days of being a user. Nintendude has been warned for mass-AfDing in violation of WP:POINT. They're also the only two users of {{MySpace2}}, a template that Kittyslasher created (and was deleted soon after). Kittyslasher added Category:Uncyclopedia into an article, which Nintendude created. They've also both screwed with redirects. Finally, they seem to be obsessed with feces. --Rory096 04:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Essjay (TalkConnect) 19:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Rory096 03:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.