Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kshatriya knight

• Kshatriya knight (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Supreme eye (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 58.104.42.131 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 58.104.25.139 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Supreme eye's sole user contribution is the the awarding of the Defender of the Wiki barnstar to Kshatriya knight.

Kshatriya knight created the Supreme eye username to give himself a barnstar "for being the defender of truth" in order to make it seem as if he has a reputation for truthfulness among other Wikipedians. SiflOlly 17:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a sockpuppet to give oneself a barnstar is, for lack of a better word, lame. Creating a sock puppet to give oneself a barnstar "for being the defender of truth" can be found floating several kilometres above the height of hypocrisy. You'll run into the corpse of irony on your way up. SiflOlly 22:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I don't see any abuse by Supreme eye warranting CU yet. As for the IPs: 58.104.42.131's edits to Women make him a likely sock, especially given the timing. 58.104.25.139's edits to Nambiar make him a very likely sock to, especially given the timing as well. Since both IPs are close, then these seem to be very likely sockpuppets. Voice-of-All 19:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Declined Mackensen (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]