Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dfrg.msc

• Dfrg.msc (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Mark606800 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• M1 abrams (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• F 22 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

As copied from Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dfrg.msc: This user has frequented the same articles and followed the same general pattern as a friend of his, User:Carbine, who's a confirmed sockpuppeteer. Since the two tend to feed off each other, it can be hard to differentiate which user is making which edits — both have made a hobby of writing inane messages to user talk pages (their own and others) [1] [2], POV pushing on Tomorrow series [3] [4], uploading bizarre images [5], violating fair use policies, Spiderman spamming [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], and some general trolling, vandalism, and/or nonsense [11] [12] [13]. Lately they've figured out that by creating new accounts and posting messages to the effect of being confused new users, they can get by for a little longer before somebody notices. At best, his association with a number of banned users is suspicious. In any case, a checkuser to determine which IP's these accounts are coming from would be helpful, as they've exhausted the patience and goodwill of a number of editors, myself included. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 01:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Declined. A case for checkuser has to demonstrate a connection between the users being checked, yet none of the diffs presented above address any of the suspected puppets, only the user suspected of puppeting. It's a really nicely laid out report if you're asking for other's opinions on what to do with Dfrg.msc; it's not, however, a request for checkuser. Essjay (Talk) 11:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]