Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Davkal

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Davkal}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Davkal (2008-03-06)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21:57, 05 March 2008 (UTC)
information Note: - accepting this case on familiarity with Davkal's modus operandi. See previous cases below - Alison ❤ 05:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Unlikely - Alison ❤ 05:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Davkal (2008-02-17)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 13:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Please review for second request. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - all of the above

 IP blocked - as an open proxy - Alison ❤ 05:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: already blocked, but now tagged. Spebi 05:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davkal

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 13:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Oops, just noticed the post is signed as Davkal, making this an easy case! The language in the post is also problematic (to say the least...) Jay*Jay (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined - unnecessary - Alison ❤ 14:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please review for second request. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not retroactively edit checkuser statements - Alison ❤ 21:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean that someone will block this sock and add it to the Davkal list? Sorry, new to RfCU and unsure what happens. Jay*Jay (talk) 17:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. - given the evidence and the self-admission, I've gone ahead and blocked that account - Alison ❤ 18:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thannks. :) Jay*Jay (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: listed as declined, I guess there was no CU. -- lucasbfr talk 10:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davkal (2008-02-16)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 04:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Code letter: F (Block log)

New user appeared on User:Raymond arritt/Expert withdrawal with a longstanding grudge. Matches Davkal's POV, pattern, and approach. This one is quacking quite loudly, but I'd like to see if there's technical confirmation with Davkal or any of his other confirmed socks, as well as pick up any sleepers. MastCell Talk 04:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - the following:
  1. AlexanderSaxton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Fc3xp1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. CaptainFarrell (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. TheLaPesca (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. IamLegion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 IP blocked - Alison ❤ 04:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: all confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Spebi 06:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check run on WP:ANI

 Clerk note: merely noting the CU and the results -- lucasbfr talk 12:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC):[reply]

 Confirmed the puppetmaster is Davkal (talk · contribs). Thatcher 03:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Davkal

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 19:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: E

Davkal is currently blocked 24 hours for 3RR. During this block the account Baaderthanmeinhof did a revert several versions back to Davkal's last version. This is the only edit by that account, and the account was created hours after Davkal was issued a one week block (during which time he may to have done IP sockpupptry as appears in the report below - looks like he created a sock account then but decided to IP edit instead, and now has used that account for sock puppetry).

Reverts that got Davkal blocked:

Revert by Baaderthanmeinhof: 20:48, 14 March 2007

Minderbinder 19:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Also:
Kaldav (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Davkal

On September 10, during a bitter dispute between User:Davkal and the other editors at CSICOP, Davkal lost his cool (over a different article)[4] so completely that I blocked him for one week.[5] He reacted to the block with further disgustingness.[6] Today an anon with plenty of previous vandalism warnings, 170.3.8.253, vandalized CSICOP in a rather elaborate manner[7] consistent with Davkal's POV and his recent disgustingness. Mike Christie, who has been mediating the conflict, has told me[8] that he thinks the circumstances suggestive enough to warrant a checkuser, with a view to a possible longer block for Davkal. (Incidentally I'd also appreciate advice on whether the IP can be blocked for longer than the present 24 hours.) Bishonen | talk 16:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

 Clerk note: The IP is registered to the New York State Dept of Transportation. It is likely it is someone's desktop PC. (Although it could be a division pool.) I suspect blocking will affect very few users. Thatcher131 (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've re-blocked the IP for two weeks. Bishonen | talk 16:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I think we're done here. Mackensen (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Davkal&oldid=1140401679"