Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cuthbert11

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cuthbert11}}
The previous request (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Cuthbert11

User:Cheeseypooofs filed and certified a request for mediation against User:Morwen with his/her first edit,[1] regarding a content dispute on the article Amber Benson. This is very unusual behavior for a new user, even more so because the user filed a RFC on Morwen four days later.[2] He/she is one of only two users endorsing this (pretty ludicrous) RFC. I'm also curious as to how Cuthbert discovered the RFC only three minutes after CP filed it,[3] given that it was never announced on anybody's talk page and the two exchanged no on-site communication about the matter. The IPs listed are involved in the content dispute. They are potentially relevant here in that:

  • Several appear to share the same general range, leading to a possible 3RR violation.
  • One was involved with Cuthbert in a related auto-block, which became the certifying basis for the RFC.
  • Cuthbert warned Morwen for reverting changes made by another in this edit. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Cuthbert11, Cheeseypooofs, and a number of Pacbell IPs appear to constitute the entirety of one side of the argument at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-16 Amber Benson. Some comments removed, see history [4] [5] Thatcher131 17:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Same user. Mackensen (talk) 02:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.