Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AppleJuicefromConcentrate

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AppleJuicefromConcentrate}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

AppleJuicefromConcentrate

AppleJuicefromConcentrate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Motorox (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
OrangeJuicefromConcentrate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
TomatoJuicefromConcentrate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Claught_of_a_bird (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Account AppleJuicefromConcentrate was created on 25th May; he created implausible/hoax articles on a shop named "Claught of a bird". Four hours later, after the article was speedily deleted several times, a new account was created (Motorox) doing the same. For persistent re-creation of the article and incivility, AppleJuicefromConcentrate received several short-time blocks; Motorox was blocked indefinitely. I unblocked AppleJuicefromConcentrate on 27th May after he promised not to engage in disruptive behavior. (The time in his block log is about two hours off because I initially forgot to remove the automatic blocks.) After being unblocked, AppleJuicefromConcentrate created his user page; then the three other accounts were created within minutes from each other and with an identical user page (two of them also with a very similar name; the third one with the name of the article he created). AppleJuicefromConcentrate maintains that these accounts are not his sockpuppets, so I would like you to confirm or disprove it. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 16:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless they're used to evade a block or to create false consensus on polls/discussions like AfD or RfA, they're Alternate Accounts and allowed... See if he's using these to do any of the Prohibited Use items on WP:SOCK, but a Checkuser seems fairly superfluous as these appear to be pretty obviously the same person. -M^ask

21:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See the header: Checkuser is for cases where there are policy violations. I see none here. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 00:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.