Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wavelab1

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

FINAL (0/1/0); ENDED 14:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

wavelab1 (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Wavelab1 14:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'i like to serve the wiki'

You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Editing the wiki.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Editing it.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: 1no and 2 i would ignore it

• See wavelab1's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for wavelab1: Wavelab1 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/wavelab1 before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. You have no contributions apart from to create this RfA, and have never even been sent a talk page message. The answers to the questions don't show much thought, or show any knowledge of what adminship actually is. So we have no evidence that you'd make a good administrator; you might do, but we have no way of knowing, and even if you are trustworthy (you probably are, but we don't know), the chance of making mistakes through inexperience would be far too high. I suggest that you read WP:GRFA, withdraw now, and try again in another 6 months or so after you've given us some serious work to base an assesment of your adminship potential on. --ais523 14:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.