Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TimySmidge

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

FINAL (0/3/0); closed per WP:SNOW by EVula 21:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TimySmidge (talk · contribs) - Edits to make sure everything is correct TimySmidge 20:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I'm not exactly sure what that means, but if you mean what I will do as an administator, I will delete and undelete what is and is not important.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Anything about Harry Potter

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I think many pages are edited too much so they become worthless. I have given up on editing those pages and move on.

• See TimySmidge's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for TimySmidge: TimySmidge (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/TimySmidge before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose and suggest withdrawl Too new, edit counts are way too low, horribly written nom, etc. etc. I highly suggest you withdraw, and watch WP:RFA for awhile to get an idea of what people don't want to see --lucid 20:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2. Come back when you have more experience. J-stan ^Talk_Contribs 20:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose answers are inadequate. New England ^{Review Me!} 20:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.