Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ST47 3

Voice your opinion (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 00:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

ST47 (talk · contribs) - ST47 has greatly improved his editing activities since his last RfA: any concerns about civility are done and dusted. ST47's name is appearing in all namespaces now - including Article - rather than at the last RfA, where he wasn't much of an article writer. I believe ST47 has demonstrated a clear need for the mop and bucket, and I now entrust the community to post their honest opinion in the week that follows. Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 00:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Thank you for the kind nomination! I wish you'd discussed this with me boforehand, though no harm, I've actually recieved 2 other noms in the last few days. It's still only been 2 months since my last RfA, and I would like to wait a bit longer after that, as well as to ensure that I will have enough time to continue editing if a nomination were to succeed. For now, I respectfully decline, and no hard feelings. ST47Talk 01:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

General comments

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Neutral