Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Renata3 (2)

Renata3

[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Renata3 (2)|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/0/0) ending 23:07 February 27, 2006 (UTC)

Renata3 (talk · contribs) – Renata3 is a pleasure to work with. Her ideas are insightful and often inspire immediate implementation; she has altered my course via astute suggestions more than once. She is a tireless contributor, and even though she continuously apologizes for her lack of time to spend on Wikipedia, she has managed to accumulate over 4,300 edits in the past eight months. She cares about Wikipedia a great deal and does not hesitate to jump in and help steer haphazard development in a more constructive direction (that's how I met her). She has a nice way of tapping you on the shoulder and pointing things out in such a way that you can see them from another point of view. In addition to extensive article editing, she is currently maintaining the Community Bulletin Board on the Community Portal. I think she would make a fine aministrator.
--Go for it! 23:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renata3's edit count via Interiot's tool.

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I am afraid I have to decline again. About a month ago, I made a pact with Durin what he will evaluate me for fitness for the mop. And I want to stick to that. I don't mind waiting because I know that I won't be sorry: Durin's analysis is the most useful feedback a Wikipedian can get. If he decides not to nominate, I will know exactly what I need to work on. If he decides to nominate, I will consider it the best recommendation. I thank Go for it! for a very kind gesture. Renata 23:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A.