Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Keeleysam

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

keeleysam

Final (1/2/0) withdrawn by candidate, original ending 19:29, 2006-04-02 18:27 UTC Keeleysam 19:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

keeleysam (talk · contribs) – {{{Description}}}

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination. --Keeleysam 19:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Moral support - You're contributions look good, just try and make some more and carry on doing what you are doing now and you'll get adminship before too long. Don't worry. --Cel es tianpower ^háblame 19:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Less than 100 edits here, and no convincing answers to questions. I suggest you withdraw and try again when you have more experience. Kusma (討論) 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Super Strong Oppose Under 100 edits overall, terrible answers below. A self-nom and doesn't give a reason above on why s/he wants and needs to become an admin. Gizza^Chat ^© 19:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Give her/him a break: she's only new. --Cel es tianpower ^háblame 19:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

Edit summary usage: 63% for major edits and 86% for minor edits. Based on the last 54 major and 7 minor edits in the article namespace. Mathbot 19:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See keeleysam's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. Any and all.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Contributions of high-quality images of United States coins and documents to the Commons.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. People uploading non-free images to the Commons causes stress, and they are immediately reported.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.