Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Celestianpower 2

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Celestianpower

final (60/0/0) ending 21:31 October 15, 2005 (UTC)

Celestianpower (talk · contribs) – What's there to say about Celestianpower? He's among the kindest users I know among other things... Been here since April 17th and has amassed over 3000 edits for you editcountitus sufferers. He has over 500 user talk edits, so he interacts enough. He has ALMOST 500 Wikipedia edits, so he's familiar with Adminly things. And in the article space, approx. 1500. He's proved himself trustworthy, now toss him a mop. Redwolf24 (talk) 21:31, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Thank you - yes, I accept. --Celestianpower hablamé 21:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support another great pick by Redwolf24! Redwolf24 (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Great user =) Sasquatcht|c 21:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cabal, er, um Support! -- Essjay · Talk 21:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support! Good user, civil, and active in the front lines (articles). Titoxd(?!?) 21:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ash Ketchum is to Kanto as Celestianpower is to Wikipedia. Extreme Analogic Support Acetic'Acid 21:58, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Extreme Pimp Style Support Great User --JAranda | yeah 22:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Kirill Lokshin 22:07, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Kind user? we need more of those. I say support.. Gryffindor 22:18, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Grutness...wha? 22:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. YYYEEEEEAAH! I was wondering when this one was going to run/be nominated. Keeps out neoligism and is in general a nice user. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 22:40, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. CAPS-LOCK KEY STUCK SUPPORT. Nufy8 22:41, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support (after two edit conflicts trying!) Shimgray | talk | 22:43, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support per cliche!  BD2412 talk 22:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support, even though I said I wouldn't vote anymore, I'm going to anyway I guess. Just so you know, I thought Celestianpower was already an admin. Private Butcher 23:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support, how can I not? -Greg Asche (talk) 23:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. S'port thought you were --Doc (?) 23:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support, did i already say support. feydey 23:56, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | WS 00:04, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Strong support. One of the friendliest and most responsible Wikipedian Ive met. I didnt even know you were running, and once again, Reds was one step ahead of me:) →Journalist >>talk<< 00:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I had to add him to User:Redwolf24/Nominations! Redwolf24 (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. Unconditionally.Shelburne Kismaayo 00:58, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support CambridgeBayWeather 03:40, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support I've interacted with this user - will be good admin, mop him. Go the musicabal (tinc). Alf melmac 05:14, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support the heavenly power =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:50, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ¡Apoyo Español Extremo! - FireFox 07:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support, again. Christopher Parham (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Extreme cælestial support with extra dark matter! I've had much experience with this user. — JIP | Talk 07:22, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Seems eager and willing to do the dirty work. Good luck! Hamster Sandwich 07:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support --Rogerd 07:45, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support. Should have been made a sysop last time, and most definitely this time. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:49, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. encephalon 10:20, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Merovingian (t) (c) 10:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Extreme [INSERT WITTY COMMENT HERE] support! All power to Celestian! sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 11:22, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Strong Support A truly great editor who keeps beating me to vandal reversion. I thought he already was an admin? Banes 11:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    If you're refering to my revert summaries, I downloaded godmode light. I'd never be able to live without it although I hear that the original one that comes with Adminship is much faster. I may be wrong. --Celestianpower hablamé 11:50, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Strong support this time, last time, every time. Great work on the PAC and related projects! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:40, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support - Trevor MacInnis (Talk | Contribs) 17:14, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support - Enthusiastic and assiduous; deserves it. --Baryonic Being 18:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support. Robert 20:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support this fine user. Bratschetalk | Esperanza 02:20, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Haven't had any prior interaction with this user, but a quick assessment makes me think he'd be a good admin. Everyking 06:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cool. --JuntungWu 07:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support a name I see frequently 'bout the place doing good work.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 07:25, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Go for it!Tan DX 09:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support. Seems like a good user (though I am hesitant to support anyone who works extensively on Pokemon). I'm going to hold you to your pledge to take care of CSDs though. -R. fiend 17:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support means the rest of us have less to worry about re Pokemon Dlyons493 Talk 20:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, improving the articles saves you a lot of time in not having to vote on their AfD's:L they don't have any! Never though of that one, thank you. --Celestianpower hablamé 22:33, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Absolutely.--MONGO 01:18, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support. the wub "?!" 13:39, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. You think correctly. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 22:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support. El_C 03:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. -- (drini's page|☎) 03:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support. Very friendly, very helpful. --JCoug 14:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support - looks like a great editor to me, and puts in loads of top work on A Series of Unfortunate Events articles! CLW 19:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support - A good, and friendly, editor who I can trust to use admin powers well. Sonic Mew | talk to me 16:10, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support --Sebastian Kessel Talk 21:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Strong support -- The guy is very keen to make Wikiportals history. -- Svest 21:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)  Wiki me up&#153;[reply]
  56. Support - yes, without hesitation. --HappyCamper 21:53, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support. -- DS1953 05:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  58. HELLLOO!! Who couldn't or wouldn't support? ∞Who?¿? 08:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support. --Bhadani 08:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  60. - Guettarda 13:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I am active in the Punctuation WikiProject and my word do I see the back end of Wikipedia there... Copyvios, speedy delete candidates (well, they're the same thing really) and I would love to sort them out on the spot. I would also like to help with VAfD closes and the odd vandal block wouldn't go a miss for my long hours gazing at my watchlist.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. In terms of major contributions, I am very pleased with my work on the A Series of Unfortunate Events coverage, that at the Pokémon Adoption Center and Pokémon Collaborative Project and on my local area. I am also however proud of my recent involvement with WP:JETFA (wikifying articles despite the dubious title) and the punctuation wikiproject which goes way beyond adding in full stops.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. As part of the WP:PCP and WP:PAC, I have been in a lot of heated discussions about Pokémon lists, merges and general notability but feel I have acted with civility at all times. My most major disagreement was with User:A Man In Black but I recently nominated him for adminship and he passed with flying colours. I respect him and I think he respects me.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Celestianpower_2&oldid=1089910775"