Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 20

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Refine. I should have looked closer before opening this RfD. Diriector_Doc├─────┤^Talk_Contribs 02:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• List of berries → List of culinary fruits#Berries  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no section in List of culinary fruits that is titled "Berries." Does it mean to redirect to the list for aggregate fruits, which is the list with the most fruits that are named berries? If not, then this redirect should be deleted. Diriector_Doc├─────┤^Talk_Contribs 23:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine target to List_of_culinary_fruits#Botanical_berries. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm kind of stupid. I clearly didn't look through the article carefully enough. If I had seen that section, I would have changed the redirect immediately without thinking twice. I'll close this RfD and just change it Diriector_Doc├─────┤^Talk_Contribs 02:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The erased emperor → Macrinus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. The few uses of this phrase on Google Scholar suggest that other emperors may have been known by this moniker. Deletion seems appropriate unless evidence of unambiguous use can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. I think Damnatio memoriae is the closest target article which discusses the erasure of Emperor Geta's memory. However it is really a very long stretch for a retarget. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague and useless. Even given Lenticel's idea, the redirect with the definite article remains unnecessary. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• keep (OP) i see the nominator, user Rosguill, has a personal ego-driven agenda to knock-down redirects made by this user, cramyourspam. check the deletionist user's history to confirm. Cramyourspam (talk) 03:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Manifesto Politik → Perhimpoenan Indonesia#History  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Google scholar search results suggest that this is just Indonesian for "Political Manifesto" and is not predominantly associated with any particular group. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as generic foreign-language term with no English-language use. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• List of current Worcester Tornadoes players → Worcester Tornadoes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The team disbanded in 2012, so there haven't been any "current" players in 10 years... Fram (talk) 08:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as useless, misleading, and unhelpful. No current players for that team exist. `— Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay (talk) 04:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NYCS stations → Template:NYCS station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Template was deleted as part of a TFD on 28th May. But was recreated as a redirect to another template on 29th May. The redirect is still unused, so should be deleted. WOSlinker (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The redirect was created so the link at Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Rail succession templates will work since Template:NYCS station does the same thing as the "x stations" templates. Without this redirect, this template won't appear on the list. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gonnym, the template doesn't even work with the succession templates such as {{S-line}} as that passes over the "line" and "station" parameters rather than using a numbered "1" & "2" parameters, which NYCS station uses. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So? The fact that the design is different does not mean it's not related to the set. Hiding it will only make replacing these harder. And I know, as I'm categorizing a lot of uncategorized templates in these sets. Gonnym (talk) 15:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Conversions to Template:Station link are still a work in progress. Cards84664 12:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 04:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Unsecret → Sam Tinnesz#Biography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is a brief mention at target. There is another at Roman Sadovsky, and searching WP shows a few others. None is any better than the others. Probably best to just delete. MB 06:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. and possibly WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, retarget or create article - Keep, retarget to a more suitable target, or create an article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The recording artist of this name is mentioned in several articles, but there's no good place to point the redirect. - Eureka Lott 01:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay (talk) 04:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Admiral Johnson → Alfred Wilkinson Johnson  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Having just created Admiral Johnson (disambiguation), I doubt that Alfred Wilkinson Johnson is the primary topic of this title-and-name combination. There have been numerous other admirals with the surname Johnson, some of higher rank. I would move the disambiguation page over this redirect. BD2412 T 00:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to new dab --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Move Admiral Johnson (disambiguation) to Admiral Johnson. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.