Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 06:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Blood in the sand → 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect's title is too ambiguous to be associated with the subject's title. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per below. Wug·a·po·des​ 17:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC) Keep Seems like a plausible misnomer ({{R from incorrect name}}) with the preposition change. What other similarly titled pages is it competing with that makes it ambiguous? Wug·a·po·des​ 21:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wugapodes, there is a Steven Seagal: Lawman episode of Season 3, a Stephen Bronner book, a song on the From Dusk till Dawn: The Series soundtrack, part of the title of a TV series produced by Chris Terrill, part of the title of a novel by Dire Tladi. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. I have gone ahead and created the disambiguation page under the current redirect. bd2412 T 23:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 50 Cent: Piece in the Middle East → 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't seem to be any relevant to the subject, nor it is mentioned as such in the target. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Jovanmilic _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There's a forum comment from 2008 that suggests it was once known by this title, but I can't find evidence of that. If it's true, it's hidden in some magazine or dead website. That makes it an unlikely search term even it's real. Reach Out to the Truth 15:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Consensus says disambiguate. Could someone please create said DAB page? Thanks ahead of time. (non-admin closure) James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 14:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Second referendum → Proposed referendum on the Brexit withdrawal agreement  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are dozens if not hundreds of plausible targets for this, and I'm having trouble seeing why a vote that probably isn't even going to happen should be the primary target ahead of (e.g.) 1995 Quebec referendum, the 2017 Catalan independence referendum, the 2006 South Ossetian independence referendum or the 2005 Curaçao status referendum, all of which (with the possible exception of Curaçao) were probably equally if not more significant. Even in the context of 2019 British politics, a putative referendum on the terms of the Brexit agreement isn't an undisputed primary meaning of "second referendum", not only was the 2016 vote technically the second referendum on EU membership (the first being in 1975), but the rise in nationalist support in their respective nations means there are second referenda on the status of both Scotland and Northern Ireland looming.  ‑ Iridescent 17:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate using the links provided in the nomination. Wug·a·po·des​ 21:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:XY is an obvious reason to delete this, but also WP:NOTCRYSTAL and a bunch of other alphabet soup links. Wug·a·po·des​ 21:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per Wugapodes. CartoonDiablo (talk) 00:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate — Interest (as measured by pageviews) in the proposed referendum is comparable to (but less than) interest in the Catalan referendum, and the population eligible to vote should such a referendum occur would be far greater than for any of the examples given by Iridescent.—AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian general election, 1985 → Elections in India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is misleading due to the fact that there was not an Indian general election in 1985. There was one in 1984 and not another one until 1989. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - clearly erroneous. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 2029 Indian general election → Elections in India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:TOOSOON. Nothing is known about the 2029 Indian general election, thus the target is silent on the matter. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as per nom. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete but writing new content about the gymnast Maria Caire is encouraged. Deryck C. 11:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Maria Caire → UCLA Bruins women's gymnastics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Delete unless a proper justification is provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe retarget to Marie Claire, though with two typos this is marginal as a redirect. feminist (talk) 12:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I do think someone searching "Maria Caire" would be looking for the gymnast over Marie Claire. However, with nowhere to redirect these searchers to, this should be deleted. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Based on a Google search she is apparently embroiled in an admissions scandal of sorts. There appears to be enough content to write an article or section about it, at which point this redirect should be recreated. feminist (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Justification provided, withdrawing discussion as nominator. (non-admin closure) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• ΜBlock Origin → UBlock Origin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target, does not appear to be an alternative name and is an unlikely misspelling. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is there because uBlock was originally μBlock, as in the Greek letter "mu", for "micro" inticating its small footprint. Often it was called MBlock as an Anglicism for μBlock. The dev changed it to "u" in place of "μ" to avoid the confusion, which is why this redirect exists. It is needed. - Ahunt (talk) 15:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable, withdrawing discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 11:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• On-oq → Onoğurs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• On Ok → Onoğurs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I couldn't find any evidence on Wikipedia, Google search, or Google Scholar, that this is used as an alternative name for the target, and would thus suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. My search primarily gave a South African gold mining company. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• AVGold → AntiVirus Gold  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An internet search would not suggest that this software is generally known by the redirect name (and that there is possible confusion with other things titled Avgold which do not appear to be notable at this time). It also has almost no usage history, so I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The largest number of visits it has ever received was on the day of its nomination here. flowing dreams (talk page) 11:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• MarioPlex → MatPat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An alternative to Marioplex, which has been deleted and salted. Not in target, although it is said that it was named by the subject of the target. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• What Arthur Rubin says. It is entirely possible that this was mentioned in an earlier version of the article and may have gotten pruned before I got to it. Drmies (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Lost Division → Desertion#World War II  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. A Google search for the term points to Lost Battalion (World War I); not sure if it's a likely intentional search term that should point there, or to Lost Battalion. (Used to be a substub, but it's clearly not worth having as an article.) Paul_012 (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — There's a movie Lost Division (2018) (IMDB), which doesn't have a Wikipedia article, and there's a Finnish hard rock band Lost Division (metaladdicts.com), which doesn't have a Wikipedia article either. I don't see the point of this redirect at all. — UnladenSwallow (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• User:SrGangsta/Eminem's eight studio album → Eminem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Junk redirect from a User page that was abandoned in April 5, 2013‎. Mysticair667537 (talk) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, useless. bd2412 T 00:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.