Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 24

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

July 24

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 24, 2019.

United Kingdom government (2017–present)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 14#United Kingdom government (2017–present)

Summer of Sonic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was redirected for not meeting GNG and looking at the article and its sourcing I tend to agree. It was then left as a redirect for half a decade without argument. It doesn't seem like a case where it's controversial to delete.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:29, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super transformation (Sonic the Hedgehog)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formerly a redirect to the now deleted Super transformation.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pablo Diego Jose Santiago Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno Crispin Crispiniano de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santisima Trinidad Ruiz Blasco y Picasso

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Picasso's baptismal name was Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz y Picasso, as mentioned in the article. I have not included this name or the version without diacritics in this nom. The rest appear to simply be wrong, adding in names like "Crispín", "Clito", "Santiago", "Patricio", "Blasco", and even "Martyr" (the Spanish word for "martyr" is mártir, so go figure). Given that they are not his name and are obviously not something anyone's going to type into a search box, they should be deleted. — the Man in Question (in question) 18:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • There seems to be some confusion in sources as to Picasso's full name, baptismal or otherwise. Britannica has, for example, Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno Crispín Crispiniano María Remedios de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz Picasso, but notes that sources differ in the order of these names. Worldcat has the same name but also Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz y Picasso. I suspect that most of the above versions have been used, for example Pablo Diego Jose Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno Maria de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santisima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso is used on Commons, Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno Crispin Crispiniano de la Santisima Trinidad Ruiz Blasco Picasso is mentioned in 2,000 Amazing Facts.
It seems to me that anyone entering (not I imagine, typing) one of these names, or attempting to link to them, will necessarily be referring to Pablo Picasso, and should, therefore be taken to that page. I don't think any of these redirects are new or harmful, so I conclude:
Keep.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Rich Farmbrough. These all seem useful. Thryduulf (talk) 07:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Redirects form the incoming interface into an article (distinguishing them from the much larger pool of character combinations which are not part of that interface), therefore all reasonable title variants should exist as redirects. If they are used in some sources, they should be kept. If they are common misnomers, we should add "R from misnomer" instead of deleting them. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Las Blancas

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 13#Las Blancas

Rossijskaja Federacija

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 8#Rossijskaja Federacija

Pen and ink

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 14#Pen and ink

Images of Saddam Hussein

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 14#Images of Saddam Hussein

Xbox compatible

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 14#Xbox compatible