Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 February 24

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all but the Devo one. --BDD (talk) 15:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Jose Feliciano → José Feliciano  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

• Les chevaliers du ciel → Les chevaliers du ciel  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

• Magix Sequoia → MAGIX Sequoia  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

• Palais de Justice, Brussels → Law Courts of Brussels  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

• Q: Are We Not Men? A: We Are Devo! → Are We Not Men? We Are Devo!  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

• Quickdraw Mcgraw → The Quick Draw McGraw Show  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete. These are all the redirects with U+FEFF ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE. Cf. Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 February 23#.EF.BB.BFWitbier. Q: Are We Not Men? A: We Are Devo! is an {{R from move}} and the byte order mark is purposeful, to avoid the interwiki prefix q:, but I have nominated it for completeness. Gorobay (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Q: Are We Not Men? A: We Are Devo! - technically useful for search results; this appears as an autocomplete option when typing out the full name, and redirects to the proper target. Delete others. Ivanvector (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete most per nom. Neutral on the "Q:..." redirect -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 06:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Superior → Project Superior  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

WP redirect to article.  Gadget850 ^talk 14:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CNR, and/or as maintenance. The comic article was originally titled "Project: Superior". Was there a merge of Project: and Wikipedia: space at some time in the past? There doesn't seem to be any reason to keep this redirect. Ivanvector (talk) 15:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The comic book is properly called “Project: Superior”, but for technical reasons that title is unavailable. Someone who types the correct title into the search box should be redirected to the article they obviously want. This is a reasonable exception to the rule against CNRs. Gorobay (talk) 17:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (changed !vote) Gorobay's solution is better. Ivanvector (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Should be hat noted with {{correct title}}. --  Gadget850 ^talk 18:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I didn't think this needed to wait for the Rfd to close. Ivanvector (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:ALIAS. Typing "Project:___" will automatically take you to "Wikipedia:___" due to Project being one of Wikipedia's defined aliases. Hence the reason for the seemingly weird redirect Tavix |  Talk  19:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep due to Wikipedia's technical quirk regarding the "Wikipedia:" term. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Project: Superior points to Project Superior as it should, because the actual title of the topic is "Project: Superior" ; the article's current title is a technical restriction fault -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 06:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. Converted to DAB page. (non-admin closure) by Si Trew (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sticky thread → Internet forum  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Procedural nomination of a WP:PRODded redirect by User:StanContributor. The rationale was: "Looks like this page was created just to fix broken links. This page is not referenced after I have replaced links to it with direct ones (you can find those changes in history of my edits on 2015-02-24)." As such, I remain neutral. Tavix |  Talk  03:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• retarget to Gorilla Manor album where a song with the same title is included. I'm tempted to do a dab with this album, Conversation threading (where sticky should have been defined) and spider silk (which is a sticky thread). --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per Lenticel. I think that's better than retargeting. Consider WP:SYSTEMICBIAS on this one. Ivanvector (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I made a short dab at the redirect. See if it's okay or if it needs more entries. I'm also okay with a dabify.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made a small change to comply with the advice not to pipe links at WP:MOSDAB, otherwise looks good to me. Ivanvector (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Internet forum actually has a section about stickifying. Siuenti (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.