Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 2

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics is misspelt. Speedy deletion. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as a misspelling. Mm40 (talk) 00:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - implausible search term. Robofish (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace to a 2007 Arbcom case. I don't think having a namespace redirect to any arbom case is a particularly good idea, but especially not something as ambiguous as "PArb" to a 2 year old case. There is probably more than one Arbcom case that starts with a "P", as well. VegaDark (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. We definitely shouldn't have such redirects from mainspace. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per CRN. Mm40 (talk) 00:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1-The sinking of this yacht did not occur in 2009. This yacht is non-notable and there should be no mention of it in any list of sunken ships. AfD has already declared this should be deleted, there was no discussion of a redirect. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--this is an entirely redundant redirect. Drmies (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the sinking is non-notable, redundant, has a word all in caps, etc. Mm40 (talk) 00:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as it is not a plausible search term. PaulJones (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.