Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:RFCCLOSE" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment (redirect from RFCCLOSE)draw editors together rather than push them apart. Shortcuts WP:RFCEND WP:RFCCLOSE As an RfC is the solicitation of comment in a discussion, ending an RfC...29 KB (3,826 words) - 23:17, 1 May 2024
- we don't have an answer that both parties accept. Levivich says that WP:RFCCLOSE allows him to snow close an RfC where he has voted. I read the exact same...30 KB (3,663 words) - 01:38, 28 October 2020
- "I withdrew the RfC because according to WP:RFCCLOSE, the nom can withdraw the RfC" but WP:RFCCLOSE's 5 points contradict every single reasoning of...794 KB (106,664 words) - 22:58, 27 September 2023
- that I don't have experience closing RfC's. I was basing myself on WP:RFCCLOSE, which states in point 2: "The RfC participants can agree to end it at...719 KB (95,345 words) - 14:40, 1 March 2024
- uninvolved editor can do those - but it is a proper end to the RfC per WP:RFCCLOSE. The consensus there is clear and the meta discussion about the consensus...706 KB (92,875 words) - 04:41, 18 April 2023
- be closed". This is quite simply not true, as explicitly stated at WP:RFCCLOSE: "Written closing statements are not required." Formal closure is listed...755 KB (105,853 words) - 19:06, 8 May 2022
- Ramos1990 (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC) N.b.: I closed this RfC as at WP:RFCCLOSE I read "...if consensus is undoubtedly clear, even an editor involved may...236 KB (31,887 words) - 18:01, 22 December 2023
- additional emphasis or explanations), such as WP:SNOW, WP:WHENCLOSE, WP:RFCCLOSE, and WP:CR (like in the sections identified here). As a new editor I have...339 KB (48,728 words) - 01:31, 12 January 2022
- 2018 (UTC) I would have NAC'd this, but consensus is obvious, so per WP:RFCCLOSE a formal close is "not necessary or advisable". Geogene (talk) 23:13, 12...254 KB (25,468 words) - 04:21, 14 June 2024
- (pretty much SNOW). I am an involved editor; while I could close per WP:RFCCLOSE, the discussion was contentious and I think a close by an uninvolved admin...251 KB (24,825 words) - 13:49, 14 April 2023
- necessarily an administrator) per WP:RFCCLOSE. -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 22:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC) Per WP:RFCCLOSE: "Editors are expected to be able...183 KB (25,605 words) - 12:29, 3 January 2024
- you for pointing that out; I was previously unaware of that clause in WP:RFCCLOSE. I'll need to think on this a bit, but I'm still inclined to land on oppose...133 KB (16,486 words) - 00:41, 12 August 2023
- 05:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC) @DFlhb, InfiniteNexus, and SnowFire:: WP:RFCCLOSE, Wikipedia:Advice_on_closing_discussions, WP:CLOSE have lots of closure...245 KB (30,992 words) - 04:15, 16 February 2023
- changed much more with extra time. I don't see anything that contravenes WP:RFCCLOSE. Endorse, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:00, 11 May...699 KB (92,601 words) - 00:00, 23 May 2024
- which people on both sides of the argument thought would be better. Per WP:RFCCLOSE The question may be withdrawn by the poster (e.g., if the community's response...724 KB (103,545 words) - 18:27, 6 March 2023