Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 June 16

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everest reconnaissance expedition team, 1921.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not quite a speedy. Uploaded by me believing it was published in 1922 but it probably was not[1]. Correct version of image is now at File:1921 Mount Everest expedition members.jpg on Commons. Image unused. Thincat (talk) 09:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Image is PD in it's country of origin (Australia) and a FUR has been added as the image is not PD in the US. Nthep (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ECWackett1958.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 1958 is not before 1955. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • No kidding. The Australian PD is because it's a Commonwealth-owned photo made prior to 1 May 1969 (clause E). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Then it should say so. Also, what is the source country of the photograph? The source country is the country of first publication, and the file information page only mentions publication in the United Kingdom. If this is where the photograph was first published, then a United Kingdom copyright tag is needed instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's a Royal Australian Air Force photo; the book mentioned in the file is simply the source of the scan. In any case, the pre-1969 sub-clause appears to be concerned with when the photo was made, not when (or where) it was first published. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • However, {{PD-Australia}} should only be used if Australia is the source country. The source country is the country of first publication. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eliel-Saarinen-Tallinn-City-Plan-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is not a photograph, so a copyright tag which only applies to photographs can't be used. Stefan2 (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ElixirByYousufKarsh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Age requirements in template not satisfied. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernesto de la Cárcova - almuerzo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright to the photograph (if any) may have expired, but there is no evidence that the copyright to the painting has expired. Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernestomalley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright tag demands that Helen Hooker must have died before 1944. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that this is the case. Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helena Sarcophagus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Missing evidence that the photograph was taken before 1955. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. With the exception of the dice, all the rest are copyrighted images. Deleted by Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

File:TalismanInPlayWithCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is board game artwork, not sure if this can be considered as a 'free' work. Acceptable as fair use regardless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• It's a photo of a board game, and not a very good one at that. Surely there has to be some common sense when considering these images. If someone is wearing a T-shirt with a Nike logo on in a photo, would we delete that too? — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 17:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-free board game. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Query. Which part of it is the problem? The game board, the cover, or both? If it's just part, perhaps it could be cropped to meet guidelines. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem is that you didn't create the game board, cover and other parts of the game. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

True, true. I just want to know which part of the image is verboten. I mean, really, is showing a board game in play really that bad? Providing it makes the article better and more complete. Web sites like Board Game Geek provide this stuff all the time, so I know it can't be illegal. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:TalismanCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free box artwork. Stefan2 (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Director Kelly Asbury.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source, "Headshots for Sony Pictures Animation", suggests that the uploader might not be the author & copyright holder to the image. Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.