Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 January 20

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:EPC & CCA Hymnal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of book covers, one of which is copyrightable The Haz _talk 08:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:School of culture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original uploader's statement of "i had it on my computer" doesn't tell us if they took the photo or have rights to it. A request has been on the uploader's talk page since November asking for a source. It has since been deleted from Commons on the grounds that it is not licenced correctly. Given it's a photo of a building I don't think we can use "fair use" because a free alternative is possible to create. It is also only linked to an article about the town, not the school specifically which again means it's unlikely to be "fair use" Cube00 (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Masterman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• We are missing evidence of publication before 1926. If it was first published in 1927, then it was still copyrighted in the United Kingdom on 1 January 1996, and in that case it remains copyrighted in the United States for 95 years from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live Racing at Remington Park.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The metadata states that the copyright holder is Remington Park, making the "own work" claim seem dubious. ALH (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.