Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 2

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yess.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sure but this looks like promotional artwork. Clarification is needed to link it with the uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• This image is bit-for-bit identical with an image id:Berkas:Yess!.jpg uploaded in 2009 to ID WP, but that image claims fair use, not a CC license. The uploader was recently blocked on Commons for repeatedly uploading non-free files (see commons:User talk:Carly Jepsen). —RP88 ^(talk) 04:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnes Monica at AMA 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A number of matches on Google Images, confirmation of this as the original is needed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Lack of EXIF data suggests this isn't the work of the uploader. I've also found larger version via Google. Eeekster (talk) 02:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• This is definitely a copyright violation. It's a rights managed Getty Image (#105209497) and the photographer is Kevin Winter, not the uploader. The uploader is currently blocked on Commons for repeatedly uploading non-free files with spurious claims that they are free (see commons:User talk:Carly Jepsen). —RP88 ^(talk) 04:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn. Diannaa (talk) 06:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AWB 1994 sources - side by side.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source confirmation of text extracts used required. Confirmation of them as PD-US-GOV or simmilar would be ideal. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:19, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Why did you add {{Copy to Commons}} if you think that it is unfree? Probably {{PD-USGov}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader added better data, so withdrawn Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ravensbruck.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not moved to commons because of FoP concern in respect of origin country, No date or sculptor information for work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "droit d'auteur" has probably not expired yet, so porting it to the Commons would be not be possible. These monuments are supposed to be a reminder of the atrocities of the Second World War, fair use of a depiction (within Wikipedia) is probably within Wikipedia:Non-free content.
• Delete Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. There are pre-1923 gravestones on this cemetery and there is no critical discussion about this grave. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mauthausen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not moved to commons because of FoP concern in respect of origin Country, No date or sculptor information on work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "droit d'auteur" has probably not expired yet, so porting it to the Commons would be not be possible. These monuments are supposed to be a reminder of the atrocities of the Second World War, fair use of a depiction (within Wikipedia) is probably within Wikipedia:Non-free content.
• Delete Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. There are pre-1923 gravestones on this cemetery and there is no critical discussion about this grave. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auschwitz.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not moved to Commons because of FoP concern in origin country. No date or sculptor information for work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "droit d'auteur" has probably not expired yet, so porting it to the Commons would be not be possible. These monuments are supposed to be a reminder of the atrocities of the Second World War, fair use of a depiction (within Wikipedia) is probably within Wikipedia:Non-free content.
• Delete Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. There are pre-1923 gravestones on this cemetery and there is no critical discussion about this grave. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use. Diannaa (talk) 06:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pangbourne College Logo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this logo artwork of the college? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.