Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 September 18

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BombardierBadge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BombardierBadge.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per this edit [1], the image was stolen from a website. As it is a photograph of a 3D object, a new IP attaches to the photo itself, separate from the 3D sculpture. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Image is a duplicate of similiar PD work that is already in Commons, File:BombardierBadge 2.jpg. Sf46 (talk) 13:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaron high priest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aaron high priest.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jessica-Miller 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free image of famous Mission mural. Copyright belongs to Jessica Miller. Viriditas (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bored.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See [2]: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License." Non-commercial is not enough. Also, there is no evidence that the photo comes from this website in the first place. Stefan2 (talk) 08:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted what was requested and then moved to Commons. I deleted the offending revision, and then put the full resolution image at the bottom back in the main slot. Then I moved it over to Commons under the name File:Truett Seminary Narthex.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narthex.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File by Mctaviix (talk · contribs) might be copyvio. It also exists here and wget dates it from September 2010. Note that the file has been overwritten; only one of the files is nominated for deletion. Stefan2 (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narthex 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Narthex.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The EXIF says the photo was taken with a camera on 15 August 2010. Is the suggestion it has been forged? The image is low resolution which puzzles me. Narthex.jpg was uploaded on the same date as this image by the same person but I don't know how to look at the EXIF. It is high resolution. However, these two images do indeed look like crops of the image suggested.[3] Thincat (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you make an HTTP GET request, the server will normally return a date ("Last-Modified"), which is typically when the file was uploaded to the server. See the example at File:Http request telnet ubuntu.png. If you download a file using wget, this time is typically preserved by listing your downloaded copy as last having been modified at this point. If you download this image using wget, the downloaded copy has a modification time from September 2010 (2010-09-07 20:22), suggesting that the file was uploaded to that server in September 2010. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for the helpful explanation (Firefox provides no date for this image). So if the EXIF is genuine the file:narthex 2.jpg photo on WP was taken before the upload to the stgeorgepa.net server and the Mctaviix version of file:narthex.jpg is/was a higher resolution. Strange. Thincat (talk) 09:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • The EXIF date is normally the date when you pressed the button on your camera to take the photo. Obviously, it would always be earlier than the first upload date you can find, since you would usually need at least a minute or two to upload the image somewhere. Firefox also shows a date. Go to the image, right-click and select "View Image Info". You'll now see something like this which shows the modification time. ("tis 7 sep" = "Tue 7 Sep")
      • However, I just realised another thing: while both Wikipedia files have EXIF, this copy does NOT have any EXIF. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yes, that is my concern. There is evidence that the server was not the source of the images here but, since the one on the server covers a greater surrounding area, there is some image underlying all these and, because of the EXIF, that the uploader did indeed have possession of this original. Thincat (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Indeed, we have three copies with different information:
            1. Low resolution, no EXIF, not cropped, earlier date than the other ones: http://stgeorgepa.net/wp-content/gallery/st-george-bulding-and-grounds/img_0072.jpg
            2. High resolution, has EXIF, cropped, later date than the above: File:Narthex.jpg
            3. Thumbnail of the one above, same uploader, later date than the other ones: File:Narthex 2.jpg
          • Since you can't generate "1" from "2" (or vice versa), we are left with two options: the same person uploaded the image to both websites (Wikipedia and Stgeorgepa), or both files have been taken from a third, not yet discovered and possibly no longer available, web site. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yakisoba.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "From ja" but I can't find it there. It's not available under the same name and it wasn't used in the yakisoba article on Japanese Wikipedia when this file was uploaded. The licences require attributing the author, but the attribution is missing. Stefan2 (talk) 09:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lll.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file. Old revision by Toilets07 (talk · contribs) is {{subst:npd}}. Stefan2 (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Varela.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See here. This is a man who is wanted by the US government. It is unlikely that the photo was taken by the US government. Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hranicky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source is listed as "www.rychleby.cz". At the bottom of the page, it says that the website is available under the licence CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0. NC is not free enough. Stefan2 (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallet flying officer swiss air force.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is not clear if the user made this photograph (with no EXIF data) himself or if it he e.g. just scanned it from a catalog. The same applies to File:Flight officer swiss air force.jpg and a number of other uploads. Leyo 19:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.