Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 November 8

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, file is licensed under fair use, making it ineligible for deletion via this venue. It's currently tagged as orphaned, so it will likely be deleted in two days regardless. — ξ^xplicit 03:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidz Bop 23.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be made by the author to represent an as-yet non-existent album cover, using copyrighted image as a template. No encyclopedic value, as it's not a real album cover. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 00:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mix925klsy.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a radio station logo; only use was on a page for a TV show (I have since removed it from that page, since it wasn't relevant to the subject). Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 00:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brickwood Galutaria Hawaii State Senate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As far as I can tell Hawaii does not have PD for government works Eeekster (talk) 02:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright laws regarding local and state government published media vary from state to state and state to area. According to the www.hawaii.gov terms of use, the use of data on the website is prohibited if it is for commercial purposes or resold (data covering "information, material, documents, text, graphics, images, logos, and HTML programming format (including meta tags or the meta http-equivalent), and scripts"). Use on Wikipedia would not constitute commercial use. Perhaps the images aren't classified as "public domain" but another classification (perhaps fair use) would be more appropriate. Certainly not deletion, nonetheless (only with regards to the senate portraits). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctoshw (talk • contribs) 04:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • For non-commercial use, see {{db-f3}}. The person appears to be alive, so fair use doesn't apply, see [[WP:NFC#UII] §1. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lewis Merletti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission statement conflicts with license tag and the source url does not contain the image. Neither statement can be verified. Eeekster (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Found source of the image. It was only a click away from where it was originally linked. Took all of 5 seconds. http://merlettipartners.com/aboutus.php . The picture is also obviously a US Government portrait of Lewis Merletti. A Google search for his name pulled more than a couple other instances of this picture being connected to him and his service with the Secret Service. Being that it is a US Government photo, it is in the public domain.Ctoshw (talk) 06:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Without a proper source indicating who created the image (U.S. government or a state government), it's impossible to tell if this image is under the public domain. If this is a work from a state government, it would have had to have been created by the California or Florida state government for this image to be under the public domain, but the current source doesn't help at all. — ξ^xplicit 03:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sam Slom Hawaii State Senate Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As far as I can tell Hawaii does not have PD for government works Eeekster (talk) 02:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright laws regarding local and state government published media vary from state to state and state to area. According to the www.hawaii.gov terms of use, the use of data on the website is prohibited if it is for commercial purposes or resold (data covering "information, material, documents, text, graphics, images, logos, and HTML programming format (including meta tags or the meta http-equivalent), and scripts"). Use on Wikipedia would not constitute commercial use. Perhaps the images aren't classified as "public domain" but another classification (perhaps fair use) would be more appropriate. Certainly not deletion, nonetheless (only with regards to the senate portraits).Ctoshw (talk) 04:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gold Star Mothers Memorial Getty Square 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of 3D artwork Eeekster (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Checkmark.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Currently used by WikiProject Articles for creation in their talk page box, but doesn't have a clear rational to show it's public domain. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 02:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment is this simple enough to not be protected (as in {{PD-shape}} ?) If so, move to commons as PD-shape -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 05:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I'm not sure. It's just a tick mark, but it does seem to be pretty original. I'm not sure, I'd need to check with someone. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 17:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. With the shading and all, this is probably copyrightable. — ξ^xplicit 03:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Gabbard Hawaii State Senate Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As far as I can tell Hawaii does not have PD for government works Eeekster (talk) 04:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright laws regarding local and state government published media vary from state to state and state to area. According to the www.hawaii.gov terms of use, the use of data on the website is prohibited if it is for commercial purposes or resold (data covering "information, material, documents, text, graphics, images, logos, and HTML programming format (including meta tags or the meta http-equivalent), and scripts"). Use on Wikipedia would not constitute commercial use. Perhaps the images aren't classified as "public domain" but another classification (perhaps fair use) would be more appropriate. Certainly not deletion, nonetheless (only with regards to the senate portraits).Ctoshw (talk) 04:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suzanne Chun-Oakland State Senate Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As far as I can tell Hawaii does not have PD for government works Eeekster (talk) 04:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright laws regarding local and state government published media vary from state to state and state to area. According to the www.hawaii.gov terms of use, the use of data on the website is prohibited if it is for commercial purposes or resold (data covering "information, material, documents, text, graphics, images, logos, and HTML programming format (including meta tags or the meta http-equivalent), and scripts"). Use on Wikipedia would not constitute commercial use. Perhaps the images aren't classified as "public domain" but another classification (perhaps fair use) would be more appropriate. Certainly not deletion, nonetheless (only with regards to the senate portraits).Ctoshw (talk) 04:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prohibiting commercial is not compatible with Wikipedia and the images are not eligible for fair use. Eeekster (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iolani vs Waipahu 2011.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be scanned from print medium Eeekster (talk) 04:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iolani Coach (Wendell Look).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Star-Bulletin photo by Richard Walker" in exif data Eeekster (talk) 04:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kahuku Coach (Reggie Torres).png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be scanned from print Eeekster (talk) 04:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dylan Underwood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD claim Eeekster (talk) 19:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nandamuri Balakrishna at Nandi Awards 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Exif data and uploader's history suggest this is not a free image. Eeekster (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.