Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 November 18

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tejas 3 view.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There does not appear to be adequate evidence that the file has been released as cc-by-sa 2.5 as stated. Permission (granted by an apparent extract from an email from the webmaster of lca-tejas.org) is "you can use the images for wiki any thing for lca but do give credit to lca-tejas.org it has been acquired by us from a photographer who visited aero India, we deserve the copyright for it" - this appears to be a Wikipedia only release (if genuine) and there is no evidence that lca-tejas.org holds the rights for the diagram. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I would agree that it has an iffy provenance, "acquired by us from a photographer" who may have just taken an image from a source on display or a catalogue at Aero India. MilborneOne (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:American spiritual guru charles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Possible copyvio of http://www.glits.mx/blog/power-players/que-es-la-espiritualidad-moderna-master-charles-cannon-nos-habla-sobre-la-meditacion-high---tech Admittedly a blog but blog entry is dated earlier than date or origin claimed on image NtheP (talk) 15:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MohamedMorsiP.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The licence is not valid. Official portraits are not necessarily in public domain. If this one is, a valid tag should be added. eh bien mon prince (talk) 16:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stellageorgesternperry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims {{PD-old-100}} ("life of the author plus 100 years"), but provides insufficient information to substantiate the claim. Sourced to dead link, without author name, publishing date, or any other identifying identification of original photo. GrapedApe (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helenstclairmullan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims {{PD-old-100}} ("life of the author plus 100 years"), but provides insufficient information to substantiate the claim. Sourced to dead link, without author name, publishing date, or any other identifying identification of original photo. GrapedApe (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabethheywoodwyman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims {{PD-old-100}} ("life of the author plus 100 years"), but provides insufficient information to substantiate the claim. Sourced to dead link, without author name, publishing date, or any other identifying identification of original photo. GrapedApe (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jessiewallacehughan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims {{PD-old-100}} ("life of the author plus 100 years"), but provides insufficient information to substantiate the claim. Sourced to dead link, without author name, publishing date, or any other identifying identification of original photo. GrapedApe (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:60 Eurocentres Vancouver lounge1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file appears on the company website here. The uploader is the person who wrote the wiki article, so they may also be the photographer, but it is unlikely that they took all three images (in Vancouver, La Rochelle France, and Cambridge). So they are not able to release the pics under license, in my opinion. Dianna (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2009 LAR School 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file appears on the company website here. The uploader is the person who wrote the wiki article, so they may also be the photographer, but it is unlikely that they took all three images (in Vancouver, La Rochelle France, and Cambridge). So they are not able to release the pics under license, in my opinion. Dianna (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004 CAM School 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file appears on the company website here. The uploader is the person who wrote the wiki article, so they may also be the photographer, but it is unlikely that they took all three images (in Vancouver, La Rochelle France, and Cambridge). So they are not able to release the pics under license, in my opinion. Dianna (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.