Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 May 2
May 2
File:RotaryIntl yelloblu150.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RotaryIntl yelloblu150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:RotaryIntl goldblu150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is most likely copyright, Either Rotary International owns it and it is only available under non commercial see: here or its owned by the Library of Rotary Graphics and the same: here. Either way the images are not-free. Is also replaced by File:Rotary international emblem.svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SCconf.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SCconf.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Nonfree image replaced by version with FUR: File:SuncoastLogo.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shaolin cover guariglia.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan image is a cover of a book with unknown copyright -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Skelterslogo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skelterslogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is a logo for The Skelters Unknown original copyright -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SLRAP.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SLRAP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is a logo for an academy and is probably not free -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sri Anirvan.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sri Anirvan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader has a copy of the image in personal collection but doesn't own copyright and therefore can not distribute the image. Author/date not known. —SpacemanSpiff 07:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Vtpatil.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Vtpatil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- unlikely own work, resolution is of a thumbnail webgrab —SpacemanSpiff 08:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Nymgo new pc app.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nymgo new pc app.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I tagged this as {{di-dw no license}}, but the uploader removed the tag and claims that the underlying work was made by himself. There is, however, no evidence that this is true. If the uploader really did draw the map and program the software, this needs OTRS. Stefan2 (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGY, HYDROLOGY & GEOPHYSICS.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Seraphimblade (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cover of a book published by the India Meteorological Department, a government department. Usually never publishes under free license. Source in image description page is "TODAY". jfd34 (talk) 10:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Great Bolas Occupational Structure in 1881.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The licence statement, "The Vision of Britain site exists to help people doing personal research projects on particular areas within Britain. So long as you are using our data for only a small number of units, you are not making money out of what you are doing, and you are not systematically re-publishing our data, you do not need to request permission from us", sounds like a non-commercial licence. Stefan2 (talk) 10:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This file isn't actually from that source – it's a genuinely self-made chart based on the numeral data in the source. Should be okay; we merely need a proper "{self|" license on it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been properly released now. I think we can safely close this one. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Software business community logo fruehwirth christian.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is a logo for a company. (There are actually two logos in image history). Unknown original copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:St Augustines Edgbaston.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan image may be taken from the church's website. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sugarsammy.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sugarsammy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image includes a deadlink in summary to Sugar Sammy's portfolio website. This and other images in history are all found on many websites, unable to track original source or copyright -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sugarsammypress.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sugarsammypress.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image sources www.sugarsammy.com and says that its a press photo. Most likely uploader does not own rights to photo. Unknown original copyright -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Portvision.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Portvision.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm not convinced that this is {{PD-textlogo}} because of the first "o". Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can someone copyright a drawing of the planet earth? I'm not sure that's original enough to constitute copyright issues.Jeremy112233 (talk) 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the color combination and the exact outline probably is just original enough. I mean, if you can copyright an apple with a bite out of it, then why would this be uncopyrightable. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:54, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:US federal deficit 2001-2012.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- From here. What is the licence of that website, {{PD-USGov}} or {{db-f9}}? Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•I've contact the proprietor of the site to confirm, but he does invite you to "Create CHARTS", which is akin to saying "use my stuff." Additionally, the source of the charts are properly credited. (talk) 3 May 2012 —Preceding undated comment added 14:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Update - from site proprietor - "Permission granted to publish or repost charts at usgovernmentspending.com etc. - Christopher Chantrill" - Barney Gumble (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lancers in Helmand Province.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete uploader has requested deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Source provided is a list of copyrighted images from news sources, but this image isn't found there, upload request for image raised copyright concerns (Wikipedia:Files for upload/April 2012#Lancers in Helmand Province) and uploader then nominated for FP where same copyright concerns was raised again (Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Lancers_in_Helmand_Province) Very likely a non-free image, very least no source for image found. — raekyT 22:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete user has a long story of copyright violations and moreover we simply can't trust users at FFU: (I'm speaking now of being a regular helper there) nearly every time the license is wrong or the images can't be uploaded (because of not having an article for the fair use image). mabdul 08:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:England and haynes at wembley.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The copyright template implies that the person who took this photo in 1955 died before 1926. This sounds unlikely. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Old badge of fulham fc.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old badge of fulham fc.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says that the copyright to this work has expired, implying that the author died around 50 years before creating it. This sounds unlikely. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Craven cottage circa 1950.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- According to the licence statement, the photographer of this photo from "circa 1950" died before 1926. Sounds unlikely. Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CastleView location.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CastleView location.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image includes the logo for CastleView hostel (see here) most likely not free. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.