Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 19

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gyula Breyer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obviously taken before 1923 but there is no evidence that it was published before 1923. The bad quality suggests that this is taken from some publication, but it is not clear from which publication it was taken. This page is listed as source for the image. It mentions various publications related to the person, most of those published in 1923 or later. If the photo first appeared in one of those post-1922 publications, then it is possibly still copyrighted. Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Would it make a difference if I change the status to: "This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use" ?--Sersunzo (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Cranwell Express informaiton board, June 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the United Kingdom, see Commons:COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not realising that photographs of information boards breached UK Copyright Law. Please would someone with deletion permissions delete this file, pending investigation into the ownership of the information board (of which it is a photograph). Many thanks — GrahamSmith (talk) 11:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lilanga-Work021-1998.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is also here but with strange colours. The image appeared there before File:Lilanga-Work021-1998.jpg was uploaded, so it seems that this file needs OTRS permission. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:St.Hubertus Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a painting. Artist nationality not clear - suspect copyright won't expire until 70 pma (>2024).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.