Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 8

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Work was added to WP with indication "create in 1939". I find that hard to believe. It does not seem to have any purpose on WP, and is supposedly licensed under GFDL, but that was added at the same time as the "create in 1939" and there is no indication that this license is accurate, so I consider it dubious. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wartburg eisenach1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The author is unknown, so it is not possible to verify the licence or give appropriate attribution to the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Author added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameins (talk • contribs) 08:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I see that the file already was on Commons under the same name (moved from German Wikipedia). It can thus be speedily deleted here. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Gimignano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The author is unknown, so it is not possible to verify the licence or give appropriate attribution to the photographer. Same camera model and uploader as for the previous image, which could suggest that both of them are own works. I also created a request on Japanese Wikipedia since the image also appears there. Stefan2 (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

author added.

And now moved to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naczelnik.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The name of the photographer is not specified. Might be own work, but impossible to tell. Stefan2 (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gas prices in 2004 Oregon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image. Photographer not given, but the fact that the uploader has been able to identify the city containing this sign suggests that the uploader is the photographer. Probably passes Commons:COM:FOP#United States in that the text is trivial, but the image looks uninteresting, so maybe it should still be deleted? Stefan2 (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nervous Witch 20.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I fear this exceeds the boundaries of fair use. Orange Mike | Talk 03:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KnoxCollegeJamaica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative of Knox_4.jpg via http://knoxalumni.com/KJS/Knox_Junior_School_picture_gallery.htm and http://knoxalumni.com/KJS/KJS_MAINPAGE.htm — both labeled © 2002 Knox Junior School. Unclear whether or not uploader is the photographer, or whether or not the source is the KJS website. (Website has contact information for website maintainer and for KJS, if that helps.) Closeapple (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Blatant.
• Delete. Doesn't pass the sniff test.--GrapedApe (talk) 17:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Si tower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image uploaded by User:Dmarzan was overwritten by User:Sharan, who never gave release or provided source of image. User:Sharan's version ought to be deleted as lacking source/permission. GrapedApe (talk) 04:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Netgiraffe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Nothing indicates uploader is author. FunkMonk (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no permission.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Stork stalactite at Treak Cavern.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The name of the author isn't indicated. It might be own work, but there is no way to tell. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify what template to use? Yes it is my work licensed under GFDL.Billlion (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you added a statement confirming that you are the photographer. That is all which is needed. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksBilllion (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Teluk Sengat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a derivative work. Multichill (talk) 11:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honey nut cheerios.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Complex package art unlikely to be freely licensed. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yo-yo history.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No license, no source, and also of no use to WP The Haz _talk 17:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother with a PUF? The image will be deleted before this PUF finishes, and anyway usefulness/uselessness is not a matter for PUF. Nyttend (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.