Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 27
February 27
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BCICcomplicated.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Advertising poster not likely copyright of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:William Marion Jardine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyright status states information is freely usable, however states "All photographs, unless otherwise stated, are the property of Morse Dept. of Special Collections and may not be used without prior written permission from the Archivist." AdmrBoltz 05:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is probably PD-1923. If someone wants to ask the Archivist when the photograph was taken that could be determined. --Danger (talk) 06:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep for purposes of this discussion, however, I will now be nominating this image at FFD for different reasons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1pictureitookinrome29.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A picture of a painting? The painting is unlikely work of the blocked uploader. With no source, author or publication date, license in indeterminable. — ξxplicit 06:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't this qualify for semi-speedy? --Danger (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a detail from The School of Athens. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Battleofchesterskull.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder of the work, this is a photograph of another photograph presented on a screen. Either that original image is not in the public domain (so this one should be removed) or it is and this should be made clear (indeed, it would be greatly preferable to use the original on Wikipedia in any case). garik (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Iam.ntlv.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No explicit release by author to the given license. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tector2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a Star Wars screenshot. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:50, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. No reason that we can't make our own to convey this same information. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NandurabarTalukas.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:NandurbarTalukas.gif Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ErrantX (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Image is definitely CC-BY-SA licensed, and also available on commons. So I deleted the local copy. --Errant (chat!) 15:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Business Model Canvas.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I can't imagine why a file copied from http://www.businessmodelalchemist.com/tools would be eligible for CC-SA unless the page explicitly allowed it - if it does, I don't see it. SPhilbrickT 23:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- On the image, in the lower right hand corner, zoom in. It is marked with a copyright notice releasing it under CC-SA. --Danger (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.