Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 23
February 23
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lady of guadalupe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Transferred to PUF after originally being discussed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 15#File:Lady of guadalupe.jpg. Original nomination was, "Orphaned, photo of a painting, age of painting unknown (maybe is old, but can't be sure)". Some discussion happened, but nothing I could feel comfortable acting upon. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like either an album cover or fan created work based on copyright protected photo. Eeekster (talk) 03:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SoClose.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Album cover is not Free License. SummerPhD (talk) 03:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2001 Bowls-USA-states.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image derived from GPL, cannot be legally relicensed under GFDL/CC-By-sa. Stifle (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold off on deleting this please and I will redo it this week based on File:Electoral map.svg (if someone doesn't beat me to it first). --B (talk) 06:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abirc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is the explanation. I am not sure why <Stifle> doubted the source of the image but this was a photo taken couple of years back in 2009 by me, I live in US but I am from Calcutta,India and so is the subject of the photo. He is a friend. And I visit my place every year. I went to see him at a photo shoot and clicked some of my own. I downloaded the photos in picassa and uploaded them in web album at that time. Unfortunately my computer crashed last year and I lost all my photos, everything. The copy I have now is downloaded from web album. I guess I didn't upload it in its original resolution that's the reason the resolution might not look the image to be original.(I am not a professional,and neither did I think that in future I would need to prove to wiki:)) What I can do now is ask the subject of the photo to see if he has the originals as I remember sending him the originals as attachment in gmail.(I guess that does not reduce the picture quality.)But most likely he won't have them either. As it was some years back and he is a busy celebrity to keep track of all these. Other than that I don't have the image in my camera or in its original size. What else can I do to prove that it belongs to me? This was not posted or used for any commercial or any other purpose else where and has no copyright violation. Also before uploading, I repeatedly tried to get help from "live chat" explaining my situation but did not get much help. I got the impression that as long as its mine and not used anywhere else its ok. Please let me know. I gave so much details here as the volunteers in the "live chat" advised me to do so. I had told them the same thing, and they advised me to post my response instead of telling them. Achau24 (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have a link to the image in the web album that we can verify it was uploaded there before being uploaded here? I think that would be enough to cancel the nomination. Stifle (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately I don't have the web album. I deleted the album as I thought that keeping this photo in the web was in violation to wiki upload, though my albums are all private, I thought it is safer to just remove it. As thats what I gathered from the "live chat" with the admins that it should not be used elsewhere, also my album space was exhausted. I couldn't forsee all this.But what I have done is uploaded screen shots of the FB personal page of the subject. It has some photos from me which he had uploaded back in 2009,but here also to my bad luck he removed the image in question after I informed him that I was putting it in wiki for the same reason I mentioned above. But few others are still there. His personal albums are not shared( only available to friends), otherwise I could have directed you directly to the link. I think being an expert from the look of the photos you can make out that they are from the same location. Here are links for the screenshots. https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1vb6iHAMM1t0p9I_fI0Hq26Kf_A3H-fTsT3MjvaP1hpY https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17VZntK2rQnvvQqTRBGwWBJdlJpyGLzyfU6IOk8G_kAw . The screen shots show that FB upload date as 2009. All these were shot by Cannon Powershot A550 as far as I can remember. Its in Calcutta at a place called Deshapriya Park. I don't have the camera anymore. I also confirmed with him whether he has any of the originals, but he said all are in FB and he just keeps moving around. Would any kind of confirmation from him help? You can also have a look at http://www.facebook.com/album.php?id=181958405170491&aid=42487#!/AbirChatterjee.bengalistar?sk=info ,this is his FB fan page(not personal), the profile pic is by me (though lost it in my computer crash, subject had it), and he is wearing the same shirt as in the image in question.(though the pic has been put there recently). I don't know if any of these are acceptable, again pardon me for my ignorance, I have zero knowledge about all these violations and copyright issues. I was just trying to make a contribution with my work to wiki, the pictures came out quiet nice and also because he is a friend and incidentally he is famous:). Again I repeat this image is from a personal collection, so question of copyright and all doesn't arise.let me know. Achau24 (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have a link to the image in the web album that we can verify it was uploaded there before being uploaded here? I think that would be enough to cancel the nomination. Stifle (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is the explanation. I am not sure why <Stifle> doubted the source of the image but this was a photo taken couple of years back in 2009 by me, I live in US but I am from Calcutta,India and so is the subject of the photo. He is a friend. And I visit my place every year. I went to see him at a photo shoot and clicked some of my own. I downloaded the photos in picassa and uploaded them in web album at that time. Unfortunately my computer crashed last year and I lost all my photos, everything. The copy I have now is downloaded from web album. I guess I didn't upload it in its original resolution that's the reason the resolution might not look the image to be original.(I am not a professional,and neither did I think that in future I would need to prove to wiki:)) What I can do now is ask the subject of the photo to see if he has the originals as I remember sending him the originals as attachment in gmail.(I guess that does not reduce the picture quality.)But most likely he won't have them either. As it was some years back and he is a busy celebrity to keep track of all these. Other than that I don't have the image in my camera or in its original size. What else can I do to prove that it belongs to me? This was not posted or used for any commercial or any other purpose else where and has no copyright violation. Also before uploading, I repeatedly tried to get help from "live chat" explaining my situation but did not get much help. I got the impression that as long as its mine and not used anywhere else its ok. Please let me know. I gave so much details here as the volunteers in the "live chat" advised me to do so. I had told them the same thing, and they advised me to post my response instead of telling them. Achau24 (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Anthony Grant.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Low-res, unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again, I took this picture. How else am i supposed to prove it. Zwilson14 (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is it uploaded at web resolution then? Stifle (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again, I took this picture. How else am i supposed to prove it. Zwilson14 (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ben-stevens.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Unused. Stifle (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Charlie batch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Probable grab from random website. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:D.J. Fluker.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this picture. How else am i supposed to prove it. Why in the world would you think its copyrighted by someone else? Zwilson14 (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No freedom of panorama for artworks in the USA. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GregTownsend2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GreaseWiki1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hewson John.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Herbert friedman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HenryCluney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader (me) took the photograph at a concert I attended! Thanks for your interest in my work. Jcuk (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How long does this have to be here, before the notice is taken off the photograph that I took, and therefor presumably hold the copyright for? Jcuk (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JamesKaye.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jaime gili 2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James-smith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The user who uploaded this has been caught for this exact reason before. For a "free" image, this is surprisingly low quality. Despite being asked numerous times (by numerous editors), the user has been unable to produce the high quality versions with metadata. I Help, When I Can. [12] 19:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur, I think a few months ago an editor was going to nominate all their images, but it didn't happen. In any case, all their uploaded images that have been questioned have been deleted. Fixer23 (talk) 23:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.