Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 31

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nurul hana.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: there is no evidence that even the Malayan image is freely licenced because neither upload indicates a source to verify the copyright status. ww2censor (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and replace with link to the original file. I can't read the language, but it puts the onus on them to make sure THEIR images are correct. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip Cutler 2009 Campaign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: possibly non-free image with no copyright tag dependent on the deleted article Philip Cutler. ww2censor (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Private 1 6bd01836539b9a960c929ceed3cde53fbb60cc65b19e78169b6e1b86274b8ae1l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, also contains a copyrighted logo. feydey (talk) 10:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Image without the copyrighted logo would be fine. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TimKnox-4842.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: the image is claimed to be authored by the subject but uploaded by a different editor with no evidence of permission to use the copyright tag applied. ww2censor (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Image appears to be copyrighted and replaceable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus, leaning Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nozomi Sasaki - PS - 10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file is claimed to be the uploader's own work, but it is clearly a reduced-size version of a scanned image from a school year book, with larger/ more complete versions floating around elsewhere on the web. The uploader has provided a link to her blog which supposedly explains her ownership of the image, but the URL requires registration to view, making it unverifiable. --DAJF (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: A discussion on the uploader's talk page The Wifechaser (talk) 12:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: (As a person who can check the URL) As far as I see, she actually has the ownership. Plus all the websites showing the pictures are not claiming any copyrights about the pictures, so they stole the pictures from the author Yuna Suda(User:NagiLG, who was one of Nozomi Sasaki's classmates and is a personal friend of Sasaki, also Nozomi Sasaki's official Gree channel is connected to NagiLG's channel)'s official Gree channel. Wish someone here can enter Gree.The Wifechaser (talk) 12:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add : I found a website which contains the picture and says "[The picture was] made by Yuna Suda [The picture is] originally from Yuna Suda's Gree page (C) Yuna-chan" (The original one : "かのすだゆーなちゃん作 GREEのすだゆーなちゃんのページより (C) ゆーなちゃん"). The Wifechaser (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - (as an editor who was once involved with the article), this picture was taken by Nozomi's long term friend named Yuna, she also has her account in Japanese Wikipedia. as Yuna's official account of GREE says, that NagiLG is her English account. Please forgive my poor English. I have an account of the same name in Japanese Wikipedia. If I have a right to vote here, I'd say that keep this picture. | Boletaria (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the image uploaded by User:NagiLG is the original and other versions on the web are derivatives, I am curious as to why the images on this page and this page are larger and contain details not included in the image uploaded to Wikipedia? --DAJF (talk) 13:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, these two dubious personal websites also stole these pictures from Yuna Suda's official Gree. Suda's original one in her official Gree channel is more large. (smaller ones are also from her Gree)The Wifechaser (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response - To DAJF - the pages you showed have Nozomi's pictures because they got it on Yuna's page of GREE. Yuna and Nozomi are both professional models and they attended the same elementary school named Ikoma West Elementary School (now defunct because of population reduce). Just as most of the elementary schools in Akita, Ikoma West had a tradition that students taken their ceremony books' pictures each other. That is why Yuna has that picture of Nozomi, and Nozomi has a picture of Yuna she taken. | Boletaria (talk) 14:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey i suggest using the bigger reversal film version of Yuna a.k.a Coco's 2007-08-11 gree diary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.222.46.24 (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think so but we can only wish it. The Wifechaser (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Minor report : The copyright holder has annouced that she'll possibly move to ixim with all of her stuff (of course including the pictures) in Gree. (although the URLs are still perfectly available and visible) [1] The Wifechaser (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Information appears legit; I would recommend OTRS to offer better proof. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mondavi entrance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama for statues in US IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep {{PD-Pre1978}} and/or {{PD-US-1989}} applies here, I think. The vinyard opened in 1965 and I see no evidence of copyrighting or a copyright registration. It is reasonable to believe the statue is currently PD. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MidlandTXskyline.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source info in the summary, although the image itself states "Courtesy: Midland Development Corporation" (A non-governmental entity). No author information, even though the license chosen is "self | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Replaceable + Copyrighted = delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.