Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 7
July 7
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 July 21#File:Mehrabad Airport logo.jpg. — ξxplicit 05:27, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mehrabad Airport logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The licensing and Non-free media use rationale for this file are based on this being a logo, but I do not believe this qualifies as a logo "to help the reader identify the organization", because it seems clear to me that this file is just the entire banner artwork taken from the top of the http://mehrabad.airport.ir/ website. This alleged "logo" image is 1000px wide, and more accurately represents the efforts of a Web site's graphic artist to decorate and identify the site. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 03:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Was my closing rationale when it was nominated last time around missed or ignored? — ξxplicit 00:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sigh More like misunderstood. I thought you had sent me here. That is, I thought I took it in the direction you sent me. I see that I am now here where I was before. I let Twinkle "help" me, and I guess I did something wrong. My apologies. I'll try again. Feel free to close this, or consider it withdrawn (I don't believe I can close it myself, and I'd probably screw it up anyway). — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The logo for a film production house in on an article about one of their films. The logo is not necessary to the understanding of the article and can be replaced with text. Imzadi 1979 → 06:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jcj-poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Item is not necessary to the understanding of the article. The image is not discussed in the article and is only used decoratively. Imzadi 1979 → 06:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bharat-jcj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Item is not necessary to the understanding of the article. The image is not discussed in the article and is only used decoratively. Imzadi 1979 → 06:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shyam-school-jcj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Item is not necessary to the understanding of the article. The image is not discussed in the article and is only used decoratively. Imzadi 1979 → 06:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jeff-samson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a professional photo, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξxplicit 06:57, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cabinet antibes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a professional photo, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξxplicit 07:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mikesweden.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a derivative of a professional photo, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξxplicit 07:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waleed soliman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I speedy deleted this image, it is back, and now here for consideration. Low res image with no exif information (or other info apart from the licence) of a sports person. The image can be seen on the net (here for example) and I am convinced it is just taken from this, or another, website. Peripitus (Talk) 10:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kmplrpl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It is likely that the copyright owner of this image is the company K. A. Malle Pharmaceuticals Limited, not an individual who uploaded their logo. ChemNerd (talk) 15:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.