Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 28

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AntonioLedesma.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is said to be http://www.cbcponline.net/ so that the license given appears unlikely to be valid. Would probably be replaceable if not free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ASAP. Copyrightable & replaceable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bao Thắng.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claimed to be copyright holder. Source is http://www.dragonofannam.com/ which doesn't seem to have any copyright statement, so we can presume that the image is copyrighted. Uploader's contribs suggest no obvious link with VN expatriates. If not free, presumably replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Given that it is from a website and able to be copyrighted, it IS copyrighted unless otherwise stated. Since it is copyrighted, but not used on any page, delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Example. GWElection4AE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of an individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No source given and certainly could be a promotional photo. I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt if a source is given. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prosthetichead22.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete looks like an album cover (did I just type "anal bum cover"?) Given that context, it is copyrighted and not used=delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD Badge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD DOE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD SWAT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FURA PRPD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD Carolina.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD Arecibo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRPD San Juan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Police Badge of Puerto Rico. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big One 398-head-sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Source states it is copyrighted by facebook. While I doubt that is actually the case, I'm willing to accept the uploader's source statement that it came from facebook. Since it is a copyrighted photo of someone who is alive, it should be deleted as replaceable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MP 1559(web).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of an individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kokolo 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a band. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This looks like a photo from a concert, not a studio. I think it is perfectly reasonable that a fan scored front-row tickets and took this awkward-angle photo where half the image is a speaker. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the uploader's comments below. These seem to have been provided by the band and taken from websites, not photographed by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ray Lugo 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• hi. we have been documenting the trayectory of the band kokolo for some time now. all photos and ogg audio files were provided by the group. all the photos can be found copyright free in many websites, blogs etc that centerd around the afrobeat genre. please advise how to resolve this matter as we would not like for the information in article to be comprimised. thanks--FunkyNYC (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the uploader's comments above. These seem to have been provided by the band and taken from websites, not photographed by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kokolo Fuss And Fight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted, if not, then no need for user created art. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• not a logo but the band's debut album artwork whihc ir refrence within the article. avaliable for download copyright free from thousands of online record shops and the band's website--FunkyNYC (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the uploader's comments above. These seem to have been provided by the band and taken from websites, not photographed by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kokolo Seun Kuti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Apparently a promotional image of a band. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• hi. we have been documenting the trayectory of the band kokolo for some time now. all photos and ogg audio files were provided by the group. all the photos can be found copyright free in many websites, blogs etc that centerd around the afrobeat genre. please advise how to resolve this matter as we would not like for the information in article to be comprimised. thanks--FunkyNYC (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the uploader's comments above. These seem to have been provided by the band and taken from websites, not photographed by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrew-350x521.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• the uploader will need to provide verification that the creator has actually released the image under the conditions claimed 207.69.137.25 (talk) 04:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Robert (the uploader) will probably just need to show an email or letter of Walter (the father of the deceased) writing "I give Wikipedia permission to release the image under CC-AS 3". If that fails there's always FUR. —Mike Allen 04:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will get a specific letter as soon as it is appropriate to contact him regarding something as "trivial" (in comparison to his current situation) as this. In the meantime, I will be looking for the blanket permission he gave when he gave us the image to post to his website during the time people were assisting in searching for Andrew.

During that interim, I trust in the judgement of the more experienced editors here on what, if anything, should be done in the meantime based off a complaint of an anon with a slew of complaints and warnings against him/her: User_talk:207.69.137.25

Best, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 05:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in the wording I chose on upload:

"Permission has been granted by Walter Koenig to use this image in conjunction with the recent events pertaining to his son. I have selected the appropriate Licensing on Walter Koenig's behalf."

Original blanket permission is given here, which applies to Wikipedia as well:

http://walterkoenigsite.com/blanket.html

blanket permission is granted to use this photograph to publicize this story.

("courtesy of walterkoenigsite.com" if you need to site a credit for it.)

Will that work?

RobertMfromLI | User Talk 05:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the permission granted at the site is "granted to use this photograph to publicize this story." and is not fully equivilent to the CC-BY-SA 3.0 which is to use the image for any purpose. MM207.69.137.15 (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Actor is recently deceased. FUR could easily be added. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anaheim.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This composite image is missing clear source information for its component images. At least 3 of the 4 photographs can be found elsewhere: [1], [2], and [3] Mosmof (talk) 05:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete marginal use on Wikipedia that each individual photo could easily supplant. As each can be redone in a free manner, the copyvios need to go and, ergo, this whole image. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep of course it is going to have marginal use, it was made for 1 city's infobox!! If you delete this, you will have to delete the LA one, NY one, and all other city montages made for their respective city's infobox. --Andyhi18 (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  The problem is that you have made a montage of copyrighted images. As these images are replaceable (i.e. someone can go take such a photo), they fail our non-free content criteria. The images for New York and Los Angeles are both from the Wikimedia Commons and show the source of their images to be free images, not copyrighted ones. — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian Singer Kishore Kumar .JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doesn't seem to be uploader's work: most probably a CD cover. Can be found at many places on the web including [4]. utcursch | talk 11:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep retag as non-free and add a FUR. Artist is deceased and cannot be replaced. It is the sole image in the article. — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orglandes War Cemetery Sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a derivative work; a photograph of a sign. While it's understandable that the uploader would think it free for his release, it unfortunately isn't. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, France doesn't have the same freedoms and PD-ness that the US does for Federal gov't works. — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ataka propaganda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of a poster. Clear derivative work. J Milburn (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with an appropriate FUR and redone license for use. It IS copyrighted, but is important to show what the party is actually saying in public. Otherwise delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Master of Hues and Tones wiki.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unlikely uploader is copyright holder of magazine content 207.69.137.15 (talk) 17:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Retag, but unless a valid FUR is given (and I don't see a valid use), it needs to go. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariel princess Mermaid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is clearly non-free. It was created by Disney and the uploader keeps using it as a replacement for an already existing non-free file that illustrates the fictional character's article. --LoЯd ۞pεth 18:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused, nonfree image. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.