Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 April 3
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
April 3
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 06:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sonia and mayor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source says Flickr, but the license there is CC-NC. Mikemoral♪♫ 01:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if it is relevant, but the entry on Flickr also states "Rights Info: No known copyright restrictions". I'm not sure how that affects the CC-NC, if at all. - Bilby (talk) 06:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In this case, I'm more inclined to agree with the owner's description rather than the Flickr license, just as I would ignore a free license on an obviously copyrighted image. --Mosmof (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The image belongs to the Blue Mountains City Council. The BMCC uploaded it to Flickr as part of its official collection, with the caption "No known copyright restrictions". If it was anybody uploading the image to their personal Flickr account, that would be a different matter, but because it is part of the Council's official collection, I think the "no copyright" caption is accurate.--Lester 02:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In this case, I'm more inclined to agree with the owner's description rather than the Flickr license, just as I would ignore a free license on an obviously copyrighted image. --Mosmof (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Flickr thing is confusing as the license predominantly applies to their own website design/operation/etc. Content uploaded can be other licenses. I too am inclined to go by what the uploader uses and not Flickr. — BQZip01 — talk 22:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Same image found at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=730054&page=993. No indication this is uploader's original work, no source info to allow ownership to be verified, uploader has history of uploading copyrighted work. Mosmof (talk) 02:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — talk 22:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Airlines in mcia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image found at http://philippineairspace.blogspot.com/2009/07/mactan-loses-4-international.html, no indication this is the editor's original work. Mosmof (talk) 02:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. — BQZip01 — talk 22:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.