Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 3

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teddytailbook2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Cover of a 1936 British publication, according to Teddy Tail. Very possible that it's still in copyright. dave pape (talk) 03:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no indication that uploader is actually the original copyright holder; false license. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shard of glass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader does not appear to be copyright holder. Image is from here where it states: "Image by Hayes Davidson and John Maclean". User more recently uploaded this duplicate. timsdad ^(talk) 06:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Londonbridgetower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader does not appear to be copyright holder. Image is from here where it states: "Image by Hayes Davidson and John Maclean". User has also uploaded this duplicate. timsdad ^(talk) 06:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroden1dayPassForStreetcarAndFerry.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is claimed to be a copyrighted website, no evidence of permission, given source is ambiguous. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroden2daysPass.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is claimed to be a copyrighted website, no evidence of permission, given source is ambiguous. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroden1dayPassForStreetcar.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is claimed to be a copyrighted website, no evidence of permission, given source is ambiguous. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroden-Transfer-Card.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is claimed to be a copyrighted website, no evidence of permission, given source is ambiguous. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Y'all So Stupid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a promotional image of the group or a screenshot of a music video. No indication that the uploader owns the copyright to this image. — ξ^xplicit 07:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephanie-march-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I cannot see anything on the images source that supports the free creative commons licence claimed. This appears to be a professional press image Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm sorry I thought this was the same as taking pictures at the red carpet and such? Would any of these two from flickr (personally taken by someone), legally qualify? EDIT: Nevermind, they both have "All rights reserved". Crap! Sorry. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 17:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reagan Wilson in 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Accompanying text and watermark suggest copyright, no OTRS; would not qualify for fair use as replaceable (living person). - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 19:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 Away2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File:2001 Local2.jpg
• File:2003 Local2.jpg
• File:2005 Xentenario I2.jpg
• File:2006 Alternate2.jpg
• File:2007 Alternate2.jpg
• File:2008 Local2.jpg
• Tagged as public domain, however I'm unsure whether these are free images. PhilKnight (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.