Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 9

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted album cover - unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^(talk) 01:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although the creator of the image did release it under the GFDL, it's a derivative work (a screenshot) of a presidential debate broadcast. Debate broadcasts are copyrighted, see here [1]; all other debate images that we have are "fair use". Wkdewey (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted album cover, highly unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^(talk) 02:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from [2] — neuro^(talk) 02:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page editor claims copyright of image and that image was uploaded without permission. MBisanz ^talk 04:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no. it's my best friends, and he made it for me Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 23:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. I created it, not for him, and I can give proof. Lexon darkheart (talk) 11:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, you have just admitted the image wasn't your own work. And want to know something else? Those other "Well" images he had uploaded were made by other people. Lexon darkheart (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He swiped my "Wellsuicide" image too. He claims it as his own work! Ninjaduck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.100.140 (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let's keep it civil. I think we should get actual links in here instead of just throwing around accusations.

• Wellsuicide.PNG
• Wellthumbs.PNG
• WELLISH.png
• Wellmiddlefingers.png (original now deleted)

Given this and the fact that the images are not useful for Wikipedia (I think Raiku misunderstands what types of files should be uploaded here), I believe they can safely be deleted. - Super Sam ^{ultra quick reply} 22:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lexon darkheart (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_572_573^15044~117770,00.html Kyro (talk) 08:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A crop of an image from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1922854/posts but marked as self-made. Nothing I can see that this is truly a free image - Peripitus (Talk) 12:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, I found this in my picture file and downsized it, so I thought that that would pass off as a free image, but I guess not. Feel free to remove it, thank you for notifying me about this. Nite Owl II 19:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cut paste from this website [4] - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 12:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio from this website [5] - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 12:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Displays watermark, unable to find PD notice on website. — neuro^(talk) 16:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Displays watermark, unable to find PD notice on website. — neuro^(talk) 16:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find GFDL notice at source. — neuro^(talk) 16:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• read under http://www.fcbarcelona.com/web/english/empresa/drets_imatge/drets_imatge.html

It says "And not just the players, you can also exploit the widely-recognised images of the Camp Nou, the Barça Toons, the shirt..."

That doesn't imply that the image is released under the GFDL. GFDL releases have to be explicit.— neuro^(talk) 16:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • You are right, it needs an another license.Janisterzaj (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Sgeureka (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find CC\GFDL at source. — neuro^(talk) 18:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find GFDL at source. — neuro^(talk) 18:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find GFDL at source. — neuro^(talk) 18:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find GFDL at source. — neuro^(talk) 18:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image was uploaded by an editor whose contributions are full of vandalism and hoaxes. There is no sign that the rights to this image actually belong to that editor, so it is extremely likely that the CC 3.0 license claim given for this image is another hoax. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 19:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute this tag fully and wholeheartedly. I challenge Flopsy to prove in any way, shape, or form that the CC 3.0 license claim for this photograph is a hoax. Further, I ask for directions on how to defend against such defamation. In addition, the user who tagged this photo did so 10 days ago and I have had no notification whatsoever that anyone disputed my rightful claim to the photo. —Preceding undated comment added 23:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

image upload has no copyright info, but a description that it is the promo photo for a television series, hence it would be copyright by the series. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a promo picture, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^(talk) 22:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted album cover, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^(talk) 23:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.