Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 1

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant derivative of this unfree image. — neuro^(talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously based upon but was not a digital filter of said image. Used to depict individual in question. -Simtropolitan 02:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could use some evidence for the PD license. Corbis says it's © Condé Nast Archive. 72.88.42.224 (talk) 04:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted film poster, highly unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^(talk) 10:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a straight rip from here. — neuro^(talk) 10:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has uploaded a variety of images of the Bluebird (some old, some modern, various different cameras, sizes, none with metadata) and so I suspect they have been taken from elsewhere on the Internet. J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It would be a shame to lose this image unless necessary, has anyone been able to ascertain its copyright status or license

I own this photograph, and when purchased, also took the copyright. I would like this image to remain in this article.

• I fear you misunderstand how copyright works. This doesn't matter for the purposes of the present dispute, though, and the small size of the image and its relevance to the subject speak strongly in its favour. I think this pic definitely falls into the "leave it, unless someone complains who turns out to own it" category. Groyolo, 03:48 16-Mar-09 (AEST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has uploaded a variety of images of the Bluebird (some old, some modern, various different cameras, sizes, none with metadata) and so I suspect they have been taken from elsewhere on the Internet. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst I see the concerns over the period photos, what's the problem with this one? It's a modern photo of old team overalls. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a poster from a company. I believe the company still retains the rights for such. Xeltran (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The name of schools and instructors are officially printed there and this poster are given away to everybody esp. karatekas interested in joining the training or posted in many public places for information purposes. This is a public poster and may use to propagate the sports, Karate. Furthemore, the school also have a right to post it since the school, Jack and Jill Schools and Castleson High are recognized training center in the Philippines.jjska®ate 空手|道® 06:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, but then the logos in the poster are property of the company. By derivation, I meant a scan of the poster. I believe they still own the copyright, thus the image itself is not free and cannot be claimed under a free license. As per WP:Non-free Content#Images, under Other promotional material, they are only valid if they are used for critical commentary. But I still need a third-party opinion on this. Thanks anyway. Xeltran (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The software shown is not PD. — neuro^(talk) 13:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Original uploader deleted this entry, without discussion. I've reverted it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No confirmation of PD status found. Virginia Senate site [1] (Deeds page [2]) has clear copyright statements. I couldn't find this particular image on its listed source "Senate of Virginia", but I did find it at Virginia Senate Democratic Caucus site, which doesn't have any statement of copyright one way or another I could find. Infrogmation (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It's right here : | Virginia Senate site It's his official Senate picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigvinu (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right there, with only a small b & w photo rather than the large color one you uploaded? Where it clearly says " ©1995-2006 Commonwealth of Virginia"? I still see nothing to support the claim "released into the public domain by the copyright holder". -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promo picture, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder (also unlikely that the photographer retained copyright) — neuro^(talk) 18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted book cover, highly unlikely uploader owns copyright. — neuro^(talk) 19:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is CC-by-nc-nd on flickr, non-free. — neuro^(talk) 19:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All rights reserved on Flickr. — neuro^(talk) 19:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

States "I created this image and allow it to be edited and used for non-commercial purposes", non-commercial is not permitted. — neuro^(talk) 19:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Claims non-commercial in description. — neuro^(talk) 19:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-commercial clause on Flickr. — neuro^(talk) 19:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small image with no metadata from an uploader who has uploaded copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small image with no metadata from an uploader who has uploaded copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small image with no metadata from an uploader who has uploaded copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No metadata from an uploader with a history of copyright violation MilborneOne (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nothing on source page http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/media/facts/photos_fleet.html indicates a CC release MilborneOne (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mr.Z-man (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original source unknown. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Black Kite (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original source unknown. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant copyvio of this. — neuro^(talk) 22:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy deleted; blatant copyviol & false license [3] -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.