Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 19

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned image, appears to be satellite -highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This could have come from a U.S. federal government source, but without specific source information, the image needs to be deleted. --Aude (talk) 03:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned satellite image - highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a good possibility that this image came from a U.S. federal government source, but without specific source information, the image needs to be deleted. --Aude (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned screenshot - target article/encyc use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 02:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This should be deleted. Screenshots are generally not free images. This image appears to be unused and orphaned, and we don't keep non-free orphaned images. --Aude (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader claims this is as her own work, though the image is low resolution and lacks EXIF data. I am skeptical of the uploader's claims. --Aude (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader claims this is as her own work, though the image is low resolution and lacks EXIF data. I am skeptical of the uploader's claims. --Aude (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on flickr under a "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic" licence. As non-commercial and no-derivatives licence this image is not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on flickr under a "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic" licence. As non-commercial and no-derivatives licence this image is not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on flickr under a "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic" licence. As non-commercial and no-derivatives licence this image is not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on flickr under a "Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic" licence. As non-commercial and no-derivatives licence this image is not free Peripitus (Talk) 04:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Second life screen capture - does not seem to be free Peripitus (Talk) 05:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image is free, because it is an inSL picture of ME (my avatar) and I created it (not taken or designed by anyone else), which makes it mine under copyright laws, to do with as I please. APreciousF (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

APreciousF is correct. Creators of Second Life material retain the intellectual property rights of their creations and may license them as they see fit, per commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Y Kept Stifle (talk) 16:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The quoted text seems short of the claimed release to PD; and following the link to the state site shows "Copyright 2009 Washington State". Note: Image previously uploaded with same name by different user and deleted. Infrogmation (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=42.56.070 This is the Revised Code of Washington section governing use of public records; images (not to mention all other forms of non privileged communications, IE those that don't infringe on a person or group's privacy) by the Washington State government under further provisions seem to be considered open for copying and other forms of inspection to ALL members of the public at no charge. If PD is not the correct manner in which to represent it then there is simply a need for a more accurate license, not the deletion of the image. Aricci526 (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unless I'm missing something, I don't see anything there that pertains to republishing (and certainly not derivatives or commercial use), just normal private use like viewing and copying. You can't just assume a license that isn't explicitly stated or described. --Mosmof (talk) 13:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fair Enough, delete it. Aricci526 (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not so fast. If you look at the website of the Washington State Lt. Governor [1] (which per the image information is where this came from) it says: Information on this Web Site is Considered Public Information Because the content on this web site is considered public information, it may be copied, downloaded, or distributed unless otherwise specified. We request that you give appropriate byline/photo/image credits. There is nothing here at all to suggest that commercial use is prohibited. Furthermore, the subject of the image is dead, so this could be tagged fair-use-not replacable. In that circumstance, I'd think this free-for-all-but-Wikipedia-bizzare-derivative-works-requirement image would be perferable to a truly non-free image. Crypticfirefly (talk) 06:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • That was essentially my (poorly articulated) point, Perhaps somebody should contact the Office of the Lieutenant Governor to try to better understand their policy.Aricci526 (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, apparently not PD, copyright status unclear. If there is better evidence of its license, it should be reuploaded with further details. – Quadell ^(talk) 01:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a (very likely non-free) TV screenshot MER-C 07:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

taken directly from a copyrighted page, with no mention on that page of being released into public domain... this is the second copy of the image the same user has uploaded... Adolphus79 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Royalbroil (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image of copyrighted text on a sign and the image's primary purpose is to show the text. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 22:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue, it existed to demonstrate that there was a special sign about them in their former reservation. If you feel that it was inappropriate - whatever. I used WP:CSD#G7 to delete it. Royalbroil 03:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

after reviewing the uploaders uploads i have my doubts that this image is released into the public domain by anyone. Martin H. (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.